摘要
欧盟数字治理格局正在发生重大变迁,为应对数字化时代的一系列挑战、增强欧盟在数字化时代的影响力,欧盟推出了众多数字监管规则。但在不同政策领域,欧盟应对数字化时代挑战的路径存在差异。既有研究从宏观战略和具体政策领域的角度分析欧盟数字治理变迁的背景、行动和挑战,并试图从制度主义视角解释改革机制,但尚未对欧盟数字治理改革路径的差异做出解释。本文从历史制度主义和欧洲差异性一体化的角度出发,提出欧盟数字治理受该政策领域的超国家机构能力和成员国一致性两个因素的影响。这两个因素的组合呈现停滞型、替代型、转换型和偏离型四种改革路径,欧盟在数字服务税、数据保护、数字平台垄断和在线服务提供商责任问题上的治理变迁分别对应以上四种路径。通过对以上四个案例的研究,上述分析框架获得实证支持。
The EU digital governance framework is undergoing significant changes.To address a range of challenges and enhance its influences in the digital era,the EU has introduced a number of digital regulatory rules,with variations in the paths it has taken in different policy areas.The existing studies have analyzed the EU's digital governance reforms from the perspectives of both macro-strategy and specific policy areas,which,however,failed to explain the variations in the paths that the EU takes in its digital governance reforms.From the perspectives of historical institutionalism and differentiated European integration,this article argues that EU digital governance is shaped by the capacity of its supranational institutions as well as the cohesiveness of its member states in the related policy areas,a combination of which has led to four types of reform paths:stagnation,displacement,conversion and deviation.The EU's governance transformation in the fields of digital services tax,data protection,monopolization of digital platforms and the liability of online service providers correspond to the above four paths respectively.
作者
吴桐
刘宏松
WU Tong;LIU Hongsong
出处
《欧洲研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第2期1-35,I0002,共36页
Chinese Journal of European Studies
基金
2022年国家社会科学基金项目“全球经济治理改革新挑战与中国路径优化研究”(项目批准号:22BGJ020)的阶段性成果。
作者简介
吴桐,上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院博士研究生;刘宏松,上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院教授。
