摘要
经济学界对于优惠贸易协定(PTA)究竟是世界多边贸易的“垫脚石”还是“绊脚石”的争论由来已久,但我国法学界对此问题一直无法给出系统、正面的回应。究其原因,在于我国法学界长期忽视经济学界的研究成果。梳理经济学界的理论及实证研究,会发现现代优惠贸易协定由于其“边境后”与“非歧视性”的特征事实,给世界多边贸易带来了正向经济效益。从规范层面看,现代优惠贸易协定的上述特征主要由两种规范模式具体运作体现。同时,在竞争政策规则的视角下,CPTPP对世界多边贸易的经济贡献理论上高于RCEP。我国在未来通过国内体制改革对接更高标准国际经贸规则的尝试,不仅将带动我国经济高水平发展,也将为世界多边贸易作出贡献。
The economics profession has long debated whether preferential trade agreements are a"stepping stone"or a"stumbling block"to multilateral trade in the world,but the legal profession in China has not been able to give a systematic and positive response to this issue.The reason for this is that China's legal profession has long ignored the research results of the economics profession.Combing the theory of economics and empirical research,will find that the modern preferential trade agreements because of its"behind the border"and"non-discriminatory"characteristics in fact,to the world of multilateral trade has brought positive economic benefits.At the normative level,the above features of modern PTAs are mainly reflected by the operation of the two normative models.Meanwhile,under the perspective of competition policy rules,the economic contribution of CPTPP to world multilateral trade is theoretically higher than that of RCEP,and China's future attempts to connect to higher international economic and trade rules through domestic institutional reform will not only bring about a high level of development of China's economy,but will also contribute to world multilateral trade.
作者
宋晓燕
邹璞韬
Song Xiaoyann;Zou Putao
出处
《国际经济法学刊》
2024年第1期35-48,共14页
Journal of International Economic Law
作者简介
宋晓燕,上海财经大学法学院院长、教授、博士生导师;邹璞韬,上海财经大学法学院2022级博士研究生。
