摘要
在“共建共治共享”的社会治理新格局下,司法权介入体育协会内部纠纷既体现了公权力规制与私权利保障的关系,也彰显了民主自治与法治原则的良性互动。当前内部体育纠纷的司法治理机制存在规制范围不清、主体适格性存疑、法律依据缺位等问题,因而有必要明确司法治理边界,完善实体法和程序法的融通路径。新修订《体育法》从规定不同救济机制的受案范围、规范体育组织行为、确立体育组织权责体系、完善多元纠纷解决机制等进一步强化了内部体育纠纷的法治保障体系。在分析转型期社会治理的行动逻辑与演化趋势的基础上,论证保障司法的有序介入与体育治理的价值趋同,并基于体育治理的制度特性以及自治与法治的关系,提出协会内部救济、仲裁、调解等适配机制和司法救济应在内外结合的双重架构下有效衔接,进一步明确司法权介入内部体育纠纷的时间、范围和法律依据等问题,从而有效厘定内部体育纠纷的司法治理边界。
Under the new social governance pattern of“co-construction,co-governance and sharing”,the involvement of judicial power in internal disputes of sports guilds not only reflects the relationship between public power regulation and the protection of private rights,but also highlights the benign interaction between democratic autonomy and the rule of law.At present,there are some problems in the current judicial governance mechanism of internal sports disputes,such as unclear regulatory scope,doubts about the eligibility of the subject,and absence of legal basis.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the boundary of judicial governance,and to improve the integration path of substantive law and procedural law.The newly revised"Sports Law"further strengthens the legal guarantee system for internal sports disputes from the aspects of stipulating the scope of different relief mechanisms,regulating the behavior of sports organizations,establishing a system of rights and responsibilities of sports organizations,and improving the multi-dispute resolution mechanism.Based on the analysis of the action logic and evolutionary trend of social governance in the transition period,it demonstrates that the orderly intervention of the judiciary and the value convergence of sports governance.Based on the characteristics of the system of sports governance and the relationship between autonomy and the rule of law,it is proposed that the internal relief,judicial relief,arbitration,mediation and other adaptation mechanisms of the association should be effectively linked up under the dual framework of internal and external integration,and the time,scope and legal basis of judicial intervention in internal sports disputes should be further clarified,so as to effectively determine the judicial governance boundary of internal sports disputes.
作者
刘谢慈
LIU Xieci(School of Law,Hunan University of Technology,Zhuzhou 412007,China)
出处
《体育学刊》
CAS
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第3期48-57,共10页
Journal of Physical Education
基金
湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(21YBQ067)。
关键词
体育法
内部体育纠纷
司法审查
社会治理
体育自治
sports law
internal sports disputes
judicial review
social governance
sports autonomy
作者简介
刘谢慈(1990-),男,讲师,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向:体育法学、诉讼法学。E-mail:liuxieci@qq.com。
