摘要
针对于夫妻间房产约定性质历来众说纷纭,在实务工作中法官对此也莫衷一是。在《中华人民共和国民法典》及相关司法解释颁布后,夫妻间房产约定再起争议。在对以往夫妻间房产约定的争议问题进行梳理后,从约定财产制的内涵和外延出发,认定夫妻间财产约定能引起物权变动的效果即为赠与,即夫妻间房产约定是为赠与。否定夫妻间房产约定是为特殊赠与;在一般赠与的情形下,夫妻间赠与不属于负有道德义务的赠与,赠与人可以行使法定撤销权来维护自己的权益,但在附义务的赠与中也要承担相应的责任。
There have always been different opinions on the nature of the marital real estate agreement and the judges have different opinions about it in judicial practice. After the promulgation of the Civil Code and relevant judicial interpretations, marital real estate agreement becomes controversial again. After combing the controversial issues of marital real estate agreement in the past and starting from the connotation and extension of the agreed property system, it is concluded that the effect that the marital property agreement can cause the change of real right is gift, that is, the marital real estate agreement is gift. Denying that is a special gift. Under the general situation of gift, gift between husband and wife does not belong to gift with moral obligation, and the donor may exercise the legal right of revocation to safeguard his or her rights and interests, however, it should also bear the corresponding responsibility in the gift of collateral obligation.
作者
宋刚
田续
Song Gang;Tian Xu(School of Law,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处
《政法学刊》
2023年第1期108-117,共10页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
夫妻房产约定
约定财产制
参照适用
特殊赠与
Marital Real Estate Agreement
Agreed Property System
Reference Application
Special Gift
作者简介
宋刚(1977-),男,四川自贡人,北京师范大学法学院教授,博士生导师,从事民法、商法研究;田续(1999-),男,河南驻马店人,北京师范大学法学院民商法学2020级硕士研究生,从事民法、公司制度、知识产权领域研究。
