摘要
目的:修订行动阶段拖延量表(Action Phases Procrastination Scale,APPS),检验其在我国中学生群体中的信效度。方法:采取方便抽样,对627名中学生施测APPS、一般拖延量表(GPS)和广泛性焦虑量表(GAD-7),四周后对其中234名初一和高一被试进行APPS重测。结果:行动阶段拖延量表中文版包含3个维度,共13个条目。项目分析显示各条目与所在维度的相关系数为0.58~0.75;验证性因素分析支持其三维结构,拟合指数为χ^(2)/df=3.41,TLI=0.96,CFI=0.96,RMSEA=0.06,SRMR=0.05;APPS中文版量表总分和三个维度得分与GPS总分之间相关系数为0.61~0.79,与GAD-7总分之间相关系数为0.24~0.34;APPS中文版量表和三个维度的内部一致性信度Cronbach α系数为0.85~0.91,分半信度和重测信度系数为0.65~0.86。结论:行动阶段拖延量表中文版信效度良好,符合测量学标准。
Objective: To revise the Action Phase Procrastination Scale(APPS) and examine the reliability and validity in Chinese high school students. Methods: 627 high school students were selected by convenient sampling and asked to complete the APPS, General Procrastination Scale and General Anxiety Disorder Scale. After an interval of 4 weeks, 234 of627 students who were in grade 7 and grade 10 were retested with only the APPS. Results: APPS consisted of 13 items, including 3 domains. Each item of the Action Phase Procrastination Scale had an excellent discrimination. Confirmatory factory analysis supported the 3-factor model of the scale, and the fitness indicators were CMIN/DF=3.41, RMSEA=0.06, CFI=0.96, TLI=0.96, SRMR=0.05. The total score of APPS was positively correlated with both general procrastination(r=0.61~0.79, P<0.01) and general anxiety(r=0.24~0.34, P<0.01). The internal consistency reliability coefficient of the scale were0.85~0.91. The split-half reliability coefficient and test-retest coefficient of the scale were 0.65~0.86. Conclusion: The Chinese version of APPS shows good reliability and validity, and could be used as a scientific test instrument.
作者
蒲少华
陈芷菁
刘玎
郭田友
PU Shao-hua;CHEN Zhi-jing;LIU Din;GUO Tian-you(School of Psychology,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,China)
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2023年第1期132-135,共4页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:31871115)。
关键词
行动阶段拖延量表
信度
效度
中学生
Action phases procrastination scale
Reliability
Validity
High school student
作者简介
通讯作者:郭田友,gtyou168@126.com。
