期刊文献+

基于“学习型对话框架”的博物馆观众调查方案研究与设计——以上海自然博物馆灵长类骨架展品的亲子观众对话调查为例 被引量:2

The Research and Design of Museum Visitor Studies Based on“Learning Conversation Framework”:Taking the Dialogue Survey of Parent-Child Audiences about Primate Skeleton Exhibits at Shanghai Natural History Museum as an Example
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 观众在展览前的对话揭示了观众的学习,如何衡量学习的效果,Allen的“学习型对话框架”在国内外观众调查中引用颇多。本文通过文献研究考察Allen的“学习型对话框架”,说明其在衡量学习效果方面的有效性。并以上海自然博物馆25组亲子观众为研究对象,观察记录他们在“灵长类骨架”展品前的对话,借用Allen的“学习型对话框架”对其进行分析。最终,通过文献研究和实证研究两种途径证实了该框架能有效帮助场馆了解观众对展览的学习效果,同时对场馆在具体实践时的方式提出了建议。 The conversations that take place before an exhibition reveal the learning of the visitors.Allen’s learning conversation framework has been widely cited in domestic and international visitor studies.This paper examines Allen’s learning conversation framework through literature research to illustrate its effectiveness in measuring learning outcome.Taking 25 groups of parent-child visitors to the Shanghai Natural History Museum as research subject,their dialogue happened in front of the“Primate Skeleton”exhibit was observed and analyzed using Allen’s learning conversation framework.Finally,the study confirmed the effectiveness of the framework in helping museums to understand the learning outcomes of visitors to the exhibition through both literature research and empirical research and made recommendations on how to implement the framework in practice.
作者 杨梦霞 Yang Mengxia
出处 《自然科学博物馆研究》 2022年第6期15-25,共11页 Journal of Natural Science Museum Research
关键词 博物馆 学习效果 观众对话 学习型对话框架 多维教育目标 museum learning effect visitor conversation learning conversation framework multi-dimensional educational objectives
作者简介 杨梦霞:上海自然博物馆(上海科技馆分馆)馆员,研究方向:博物馆教育,通讯地址:上海市静安区山海关路399号,邮编:200041,Email:yangmx@sstm.org.cn。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献13

  • 1伍新春,李长丽,曾筝,季娇.科技场馆中的亲子互动类型及其对学习效果的影响[J].教育研究与实验,2012(6):88-92. 被引量:20
  • 2Dierking L D,Falk J H.Family behaviour and learning in informal science settings:A review of the research[J].Science Education,1994,(1):57-72.
  • 3Zimmerman H T,Reeve S,Bell P.Family sense-making practices in science centre conversations[J].Science Education,2010,(3):478-505.
  • 4Ash D,Wells G.Dialogic inquiry in classroom and museum:Actions,tools and talk.Bekerman Z,Burbules N C,Keller D S.Learning in places:The informal education reader[C].New York:Peter Lang,2006:35-54.
  • 5isiel J,Rowe S,Vartabedian M A,et al.Evidence for family engagement in scientific reasoning at interactive animal exhibits[J].Science Education,2012,(6):1047-1070.
  • 6Allen S.Looking for learning in visitor talk:A methodological exploration.Leinhardt G,Crowley K,Knutson K.Learning conversations in museums[C].Mahwah,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,2002:259-303.
  • 7Scott P H,Mortimer E F,Aguiar O G.The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse:A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons[J].Science Education,2006,(4):605-631.
  • 8严建强.从展示评估出发:专家判断与观众判断的双重实现[J].中国博物馆,2008(2):71-80. 被引量:57
  • 9伍新春,曾筝,谢娟,康长运.场馆科学学习:本质特征与影响因素[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2009(5):13-19. 被引量:83
  • 10青紫馨,伍新春.学生在科技馆中的对话特点及先前知识的影响作用[J].科普研究,2013,8(2):49-53. 被引量:6

共引文献33

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部