摘要
刑民交叉于近年成为理论界与实务界的研究热点,而该术语本身却仅停留于描述司法现象,无法适用于司法实践,在理论与实务上分别呈现研究问题各起一端和案件问题一体处理两种趋势。故与其执着于厘清概念,不如通过类型化的方法总结并贯通问题。基于刑民交叉问题既有的程序与实体的两分法,总结出两个面向背后的核心议题。然后,分别对刑事与民事案件样本所反映的实务争点与裁判要旨加以提炼,在“个案与个案”“规范与规范”两组分析框架下指出样本之间或样本自身的矛盾所在。继而引入法秩序统一原理,总结认为刑民交叉案件应经过审理进程、另案裁判、责任承担的三步检视以满足司法实践诉讼与实体问题一体解决的要求,最后尝试指出刑事与民事各自的体系化构造方向。
In recent years,criminal-civil overlapping has become a hot research topic in both theoretical and practical fields,but the term itself is only used to describe judicial phenomena instead of being applied to judicial practice.In theory and practice,there are two tendencies of separation of problem research and combination of case handling.Hence it is better to summarize and penetrate the problem by classification rather than be obsessed with clarifying the concept.Based on the existing dichotomy of procedure and entity of criminal-civil overlapping,the core issues behind the two aspects are summarized.Then through the extraction of the practical contention and judgment gist reflected by the samples of criminal and civil cases respectively,under two frameworks of“case and case”and“norm and norm”,the contradictions between samples or of sample itself are pointed out.Accordingly,the principle of unity of legal order are introduced and it is concluded that in order to meet the requirement of solving litigation and substantive problems together in judicial practice,criminal-civil overlapping cases should be examined in three steps:the process of trial,the judgment of a separate case and the assumption of responsibility.Finally,the respective systematization directions of criminal and civil cases are pointed out.
作者
宣頔
徐瑞胜
Xuan Di;Xu Ruisheng
出处
《常州大学学报（社会科学版）》
2022年第3期23-38,共16页
Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目“系统性金融风险治理的公私合作法律机制研究”(17CFX032)。
关键词
刑民交叉
法秩序统一
“先刑后民”
criminal-civil overlapping
unity of legal order
“criminal trial before civil trial”
作者简介
宣頔,法学博士,常州大学史良法学院副教授、硕士研究生导师,上海交通大学凯原法学院博士后;徐瑞胜,常州大学史良法学院硕士研究生。
