期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎合并2型糖尿病患者的疗效分析 被引量:2

Efficacy analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis complicated with type 2 diabetes mellitus
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎合并2型糖尿病患者的临床疗效。方法选取2019年5月至2020年5月本院收治的100例急性结石性胆囊炎合并2型糖尿病患者作为研究对象,随机分为对照组与干预组,每组50例。对照组采用传统开腹手术治疗,干预组采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、排气时间、下床活动时间、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术后并发症发生率及住院时间。结果干预组手术时间、排气时间、下床活动时间均短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组(P<0.05)。术前,两组VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义;术后,两组VAS评分均高于术前,但干预组低于对照组(P<0.05)。干预组并发症发生率为4.0%,低于对照组的18.0%(P<0.05);干预组住院时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。结论与传统开腹手术相比,腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎合并2型糖尿病效果显著,可明显缩短手术时间,减少术中出血量和术后并发症发生,减轻疼痛程度,促进预后康复,值得临床推广应用。
作者 刘伟男 郝晶 张东 陈广泉 LIU Weinan;HAO Jing;ZHANG Dong
出处 《当代医学》 2022年第12期165-167,共3页 Contemporary Medicine
作者简介 通信作者:陈广泉,E-mail:38401225@qq.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献35

  • 1Rajani Rai,Mallika Tewari,Mohan Kumar,Tej Bali Singh,Hari S Shukla.Expression profile of cholecystokinin type-A receptor in gallbladder cancer and gallstone disease[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2011,10(4):408-414. 被引量:8
  • 2Xiong Ding, Chang-You Lu, Ying Mei, Chang-An Liu and Yu-Jun Shi Chongqing, China Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Second Clinical College, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.Correlation between gene expression of CCK-A receptor and emptying dysfunction of the gallbladder in patients with gallstones and diabetes mellitus[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2005,4(2):295-298. 被引量:20
  • 3Bile anaerobic bacteria detection and antibiotic susceptibility in patients with gallstone[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2003,2(3):431-434. 被引量:4
  • 4李金明,张凌武,温济民,刘琛,王建锋,邹卫,廖伟敏,陈耀智,韩世星.高龄高危高难度腹腔镜胆囊切除术[J].中国内镜杂志,2006,12(1):63-65. 被引量:10
  • 5Marks J M, Phillips M S, Tacchino R, et al. Single-incisionlaparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesisscoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year resultsof a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial oftraditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incisionlaparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Journal of the American College ofSurgeons, 2013, 216(6): 1037-1047.
  • 6Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single incision versusconventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J]. British Journal ofSurgery, 2013, 100(2): 191-208.
  • 7Kim H, Suh K S, Lee K W, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopicversus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: acase-controlled study with propensity score matching [J]. Surgicalendoscopy, 2014, 28(3): 950-960.
  • 8Fuks D, Regimbeau J M, Pessaux P, et al. Is port-site resectionnecessary in the surgical management of gallbladder cancer? [J].Journal of visceral surgery, 2013,150(4): 277-284.
  • 9Kuwabara J, Watanabe Y, Kameoka K, et al. Usefulness oflaparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy with operativecholangiography for severe cholecystitis [J]. Surgery today, 2014, 44(3): 462-465.
  • 10Atallah S, Nassif G, Polavarapu H, et al. Robotic-assisted transanalsurgery for total mesorectal excision (RATS-TME): a description of anovel surgical approach with video demonstration [J]. Techniques incoloproctology, 2013,17(4): 441-447.

共引文献235

同被引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部