期刊文献+

腹腔镜根治术在老年胃癌患者中的应用效果 被引量:4

Application effect of laparoscopic radical resection in elderly patients with gastric cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨腹腔镜根治术在老年胃癌患者中的应用效果。方法 依据治疗方法的不同将106例老年胃癌患者分为观察组和对照组,每组53例,对照组患者实施传统开腹根治术,观察组患者实施腹腔镜根治术。比较两组患者的手术相关指标、炎性因子[C反应蛋白(CRP)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)]水平、免疫因子(CD3^(+)、CD4^(+)、CD8^(+)、CD4^(+)/CD8^(+))水平、血清肿瘤标志物[糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)]水平、满意度及并发症发生率。结果 观察组患者的术中出血量明显少于对照组,术后肛门首次排气时间、住院时间均明显短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.01)。治疗后,两组患者的CRP和TNF-α水平均高于本组治疗前,观察组患者CRP和TNF-α水平均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的CD3^(+)、CD4^(+)水平及CD4^(+)/CD8^(+)均低于本组治疗前,CD8^(+)水平均高于本组治疗前,且观察组患者的CD3^(+)、CD4^(+)水平及CD4^(+)/CD8^(+)均高于对照组,CD8^(+)水平低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的血清CA19-9、NSE、CEA及AFP水平均低于本组治疗前,且观察组患者的血清CA19-9、NSE、CEA及AFP水平均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。观察组患者的满意度为96.23%,明显高于对照组患者的79.25%(P﹤0.01);观察组患者的并发症总发生率为9.43%,低于对照组患者的24.53%(P﹤0.05)。结论 采用腹腔镜根治术治疗老年胃癌患者可有效改善手术相关指标,降低创伤性刺激诱发的炎性反应,改善免疫抑制状态,降低血清肿瘤标志物水平和并发症发生率,提高患者满意度。 Objective To explore the application effect of laparoscopic radical resection in elderly patients with gastric cancer. Method A total of 106 elderly patients with gastric cancer were divided into observation group and control group according to different treatment methods, with 53 cases in each group. The control group was treated with traditional open radical resection, while the observation group was treated with laparoscopic radical resection. The surgical indicators, inflammatory factor [C-reactive protein(CRP) and tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α)] levels, immune function levels(CD3^(+), CD4^(+), CD8^(+)and CD4^(+)/CD8^(+)), serum tumor marker [carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9), neuron specific enolase(NSE), carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA), alpha fetoprotein(AFP)] levels, and satisfaction and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Result The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was less than that in the control group, the first postoperative anal exhaust time and hospital stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P<0.01). After treatment, the levels of CRP and TNF-α in the two groups were higher than those before treatment, and the levels of CRP and TNF-α in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). After treatment, the CD3^(+), CD4^(+)levels and CD4^(+)/CD8^(+)in the two groups were lower than those before treatment, the CD8^(+)levels were higher than those before treatment, the CD3^(+),CD4^(+)levels and CD4^(+)/CD8^(+)in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the CD8^(+)level was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of serum CA19-9, NSE, CEA and AFP in the two groups were lower than those before treatment, and the levels of serum CA19-9, NSE, CEA and AFP in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). The satisfaction rate of the observation group was96.23%, higher than that of 79.25% of the control group(P<0.01). The complication rate was 9.43% in the observation group, lower than that of 24.53% in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic radical resection for elderly patients with gastric cancer can effectively improve surgical indicators, reduce inflammatory response caused by traumatic stimulus, relieve immune suppression, reduce the levels of serum tumor markers and the complication rate, improve patients’ satisfaction.
作者 郭晓磊 杨战锋 傅聿铭 闫军浩 吴万庆 王文真 GUO Xiaolei;YANG Zhanfeng;FU Yuming;YAN Junhao;WU Wanqing;WANG Wenzhen(Department of Gastrointestinal Thyroid Surgery,the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450002,He’nan,China;Department of Digestive Medicine,the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450002,He’nan,China)
出处 《癌症进展》 2022年第5期479-482,496,共5页 Oncology Progress
关键词 腹腔镜根治术 胃癌 炎性因子 免疫因子 血清肿瘤标志物 laparoscopic radical resection gastric cancer inflammatory factor immune factor serum tumor marker
作者简介 通信作者:郭晓磊,邮箱:guoxiaolei2013@163.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献106

  • 1姜可伟.规范全球第二大致死率疾病的诊断——《胃癌诊断标准》解读[J].中国卫生标准管理,2010,1(4):26-28. 被引量:78
  • 2Ajani JA,Bekaii-Saab T,Yang G. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology:gastric cancer[M].2009.
  • 3Karam SM. Cellular origin of gastric cancer[J].Ann N Y Aced Sci,2008.162-168.
  • 4Hamashima C,Shibuya D,Yamazaki H. The Japaneseguidelines for gastric cancer screening[J].Jpn 1 Clin Oncol,2008,(04):259-267.
  • 5Leung WK,Wu MS,Kakugawa Y. Asia Pacific WorkingGroup on Gastric Cancer.Screening for gastric cancer in Asia:current evidence and practice[J].{H}LANCET ONCOLOGY,2008,(03):279-287.
  • 6Jatzko GR,Lisborg PH,Denk H. A 10-year experience with Japanese-type radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer outside of Japan[J].{H}CANCER,1995,(08):1302-1312.
  • 7Parkin DM,Bray F,Ferlay J. Global cancer statistics,2002[J].{H}CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians,2005,(02):74-108.
  • 8Sierra A,Regueira FM,Hernlxndez-LiwGin JL. Role of the extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer surgery:experience in a single institution[J].{H}ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY,2003,(03):219-226.
  • 9董志伟;谷铣之.临床肿瘤学[M]{H}北京:人民卫生出版社,20029-27.
  • 10Enzinger PC,Benedetti JK,Meyerhardt JA. Impact of hospital volume on recurrence and survival after surgery for gastnc cancer[J].2007,(03):426-434.

共引文献461

同被引文献46

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部