摘要
司法领域的智能化改革在政策导向和现实需求下展开,其具有提升司法效率和保障司法公正的价值意蕴。目前,在智能技术发展和应用的支撑下,智能化的案件检索机制、司法推理机制和司法监督机制等为司法智能化的实现提供可行性路径。但司法裁判所必须的价值判断与利益衡量,使其并非仅是技术性活动,因此,司法智能化有其功能发挥的必要限度,需要通过厘清智能辅助的功能定位,有限范围的功能适用和人机协作的功能预期,形成对司法智能化的限度审思。
The intelligent reform of the judicial field is carried out under the policy orientation and actual needs, and it has the value pursuit of improving judicial efficiency and ensuring judicial justice. At present, with the support of the development and application of intelligent technology, intelligent case retrieval mechanism, judicial reasoning mechanism and judicial supervision mechanism can provide a feasible path for the realization of judicial intelligence. However, the value judgment and interest measurement required by justice make it not only a technical activity. Therefore, judicial intelligence has the necessary limits for its function. It is necessary to clarify the functional positioning of intelligent assistance in intelligent justice, the functional application of a limited range, and the functional expectations of human-machine collaboration, so as to form a limited review of judicial intelligence.
作者
苗运卫
MIAO Yun-wei(School of Law,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou,Guangdong,510006)
出处
《广州广播电视大学学报》
2022年第1期86-92,112,共8页
Journal of Guangzhou Open University
基金
2019年度国家社科基金项目“法治中国的主体性建构研究”(项目编号:19FFB030)
2020年度中央高校专项资金资助项目“社会治理智能化的法律问题研究”(项目编号:ZDPY 202034)。
关键词
司法智能化
智能辅助
实现机制
限度审思
judicial intelligence
intelligent assistance
realization mechanism
limit review
作者简介
苗运卫,男,在读硕士研究生,主要研究方向为网络与信息法。
