摘要
当前我国法理学界存在社科法学与法教义学之争,这一争论实际上涉及法学知识论的问题。法学知识是不断演进与分化的,我国法学知识随着法治建设的进程取得了长足的进步。政法法学、社科法学和法教义学的承接与递进,可以勾划出我国法学知识的演变过程。而法学的知识性质,在很大程度上取决于其研究对象和研究方法这两个要素。从研究对象的角度来说,法作为一种规则体系,学者可以采取不同方法,从不同维度进行考察,据此将法学知识区分为社科法学与法教义学。在这个意义上说,社科法学与法教义学之间并非对立的关系,而只不过是法学知识的两个不同面向。
At present,there is a dispute between law and social sciences and legal dogmatics in the field of jurisprudence in China,which actually involves the problem of legal knowledge theory.Legal knowledge is constantly evolving and differentiating,and Chinese legal knowledge has made great progress with the process of building the rule of law.The undertaking and progressive development of political law,law and social sciences and legal dogmatics can outline the evolution of legal knowledge in China.The intellectual nature of law depends,to a large extent,on the two elements which are research object and research method.From the point of view of the research object,law,as a rule system,the legal knowledge can be distinguished into law and social science and legal dogmatic by scholars who investigate from different dimensions in different ways.In this sense,the relationship between law and social sciences and legal dogmatics is not antagonistic,but only two different orientations of legal knowledge.
出处
《中国法律评论》
CSSCI
2021年第4期73-82,共10页
China Law Review
关键词
法学知识
社科法学
法教义学
Legal Knowledge
Law and Social Sciences
Legal Dogmatics
作者简介
陈兴良,北京大学博雅讲席教授。
