期刊文献+

1.5T核磁共振成像与多层螺旋CT对肩峰下撞击综合征的诊断价值比较 被引量:2

Comparison of the diagnostic value of 1.5T MRI and multi-slice spiral CT for subacromial impingement syndrome
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较1.5T核磁共振成像(MRT)与多层螺旋CT(MSCT)对肩峰下撞击综合征的诊断价值。方法:2019年1月-2020年1月收治肩峰下撞击综合征患者54例,分别利用1.5T MRI和MSCT检查。比较两种检查方式的诊断灵敏度、约登指数、诊断特异性、Bigliani检出率等指标。结果:MRI诊断的灵敏度与约登指数均高于MSCT,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);MRI与MSCT诊断特异性比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在MRI与MSCT检查中,其肩峰段形态BiglianiⅠ型与Ⅱ型的检出率相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);MRI在肩峰段形态BiglianiⅢ型的检出率高于MSCT,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在肩峰下撞击综合征诊断中,MRI与MSCT的特异性虽然无差异,但灵敏度前者高于后者,其对软组织的分辨率更高,无辐射,临床推广可能性更强。 Objective:To compare the diagnostic value of 1.5T MRI and multi-slice spiral CT(MSCT)for subacromial impingement syndrome.Methods:From January 2019 to January 2020,54 patients with subacromial impingement syndrome were seleccted.1.5T magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)and MSCT were used.We compared the indicators of diagnostic sensitivity,Youden index,diagnostic specificity,Bigliani detection rate,etc under the two inspection methods.Results:The sensitivity diagnosis and the Youden index of MRI were higher than MSCT,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The specificity of MRI and MSCT was not statistically significant(P>0.05).In MRI and MSCT examination,the detection rate of the acromion morphology Bigliani typeⅠandⅡwas not statistically different(P>0.05).The detection rate of BiglianiⅢacromion morphology of MRI was higher than that of MSCT,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome,although the specificity of 1.5T MRI and multi-slice spiral CT is not different,the sensitivity of the former is higher than that of the latter,and its resolution to soft tissues is higher without radiation.The potential for clinical replication is much stronger.
作者 居晓峰 Ju Xiaofeng(The First People's Hospital of Wuxue City,Hubei Wuxue 435400)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2021年第25期97-98,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 1.5T核磁共振成像 多层螺旋CT 肩峰下撞击综合征 诊断准确率 临床价值 1.5T MRI Multi-slice spiral CT Subacromial impingement syndrome Diagnostic accuracy Clinical value
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献44

共引文献51

同被引文献30

引证文献2

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部