期刊文献+

国际经贸协定中的源代码规则新发展及中国立场 被引量:13

New Developments in the Rules on Source Code in International Trade Agreements and China’s Position
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 国家在追求网络安全和反垄断等公共政策目标时可能要求软件所有人转让或提供其源代码或算法,这与将源代码和算法作为商业秘密保护的普遍做法产生了冲突,并可能限制市场准入和妨碍自由贸易。鉴于以WTO体系为代表的传统经贸规则难以有效约束上述措施,《全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(CPTPP)等国际经贸协定开始设置专门的源代码规则,明确禁止缔约方要求软件所有人转让或允许获取其源代码甚至算法。不过,尽管源代码规则允许一定的例外情形,但仍会对国家规制权产生不同程度的影响,特别是可能不利影响缔约方规制软件相关服务贸易和算法、实施开源政策的自主性和灵活性。中国可将安全可控和开放创新并重作为基本规制立场,原则上不要求软件所有人转让和提供源代码,同时注意在国际经贸谈判中保留相应的规制空间,并重点协调与美欧的规制立场分歧。 A country may, in pursuit of such public policy objectives as cybersecurity and anti-monology, require a software owner to transfer or provide its source code or algorithms. However, such requirements conflict with the practice protecting source code and algorithms as trade secrets, and may limit market access and free trade. Having considered that traditional trade rules like WTO rules have flaws in effectively restricting the foregoing requirements, international trade agreements such as CPTPP initiated the rules on source code, which explicitly prohibit a contracting party from requiring a software owner to transfer or grant access to its source code or algorithms. However, despite of some exceptions contained in the rules on source code, the rules may still negatively impact a contracting party’s right to regulate, especially the party’s regulatory autonomy and flexibility in the fields of software-related trade in services, open source policies and algorithm regulation. It’s suggested that China take"being secure and controllable is as equally important as being open and innovative" as its fundamental regulatory position, and should not in principle require a software owner to transfer or grant access to its source code. It’s also noted that China should preserve certain space for regulating source code in international trade negotiations, and coordinate regulatory divergence with the United States and European Union.
作者 鄢雨虹 YAN Yuhong
出处 《武大国际法评论》 2021年第3期97-117,共21页 Wuhan University International Law Review
关键词 源代码规则 软件类数字产品 国家规制权 数字贸易 算法规制 the rules on source code software digital product States’right to regulate digital trade algorithm regulation
作者简介 鄢雨虹,对外经济贸易大学法学院国际法学博士研究生。
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献178

  • 1姜建明,陈立虎.WTO例外条款及其法理基础[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,23(2):31-35. 被引量:8
  • 2孙笑侠,冯建鹏.监督,能否与法治兼容——从法治立场来反思监督制度[J].中国法学,2005(4):13-24. 被引量:53
  • 3Patrick Thibodeau,Sponsors Surrender Wont End UCITA Battle;Related licensing issues still expected to surface in new vendor contracts[J/OL]. Computerworld,2003-08-11, [2008-8-30]. http://www.computer world.eom/govemmenttopics/govemment/legislation/story/O,10801,83870.00.html.
  • 4Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software,Ltd. (Sth Cir. 1988).
  • 5ProCD,Inc. v. Zeidenberg. (7th Cir. 1996).
  • 6Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software,Ltd.,655 F. Supp. 763(E.D. La. 1987).
  • 7Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software,I,td.,847 F.2d 255(5th Cir. 1988).
  • 8See Step-Saver Data Sys.,Inc. v. Wyse Technology.,939 F.2d 91(3d Cir. 1991),Arizona Retail Sys.,Inc. v. Software Link,Inc.,831 F. Supp. 759(D. Ariz. 1993).
  • 9See U.C.C.(1996)§ 2-207.
  • 10Pro CD,Inc. v. Zeidenberg,908 F. Supp. at 655,38 U.S.P.Q.2d at 1524(W.D. Wis. 1996).

同被引文献133

引证文献13

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部