期刊文献+

中文版护士报警疲劳量表的信效度研究 被引量:4

Reliability and validity on Chinese version of Nurse Alarm Fatigue Scale
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对护士报警疲劳量表(NAFS)进行汉化及信效度分析。方法通过便利取样的抽样方法,对上海市1056名三甲医院重症监护室(ICU)护士进行问卷调查,并运用SPSS21.0和AMOS22.0统计软件对所得数据进行分析、处理。结果中文版护士报警疲劳量表(NAFS-C)条目相关性分析结果显示,所有条目-总分均呈显著性相关;I-CVI为0.830~1.000,S-CVI/UA为0.860、S-CVI/Ave为0.970;探索性因子分析得到三因子结构方程模型,累积方差贡献率为77.645%,对模型进行结构性因子分析得到CMIN/DF<3,GFI、TLI、CFI均>0.90,RMSEA<0.08,PGFI>0.50;Cronbach a系数为0.883,3个维度的Cronbach a系数分别为0.876、0.882、0.755,分半信度系数为0.769,重测组内相关系数为0.795。结论NAFS-C信效度良好,可用于评价我国ICU护士报警疲劳的状态,从而为ICU护士报警疲劳的管理提供一种更加简便的新型工具。 Objective To translate Nurses Alarm Fatigue Scale(NAFS)into Chinese and test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version,then provides a new and simple tool for the monitoring and management of alarm fatigue.Methods Convenience sampling method was adopted to conduct a questionnaire survey on 1056 ICU nurses,and SPSS21.0 and AMOS22.0 software were used for statistical analysis.Results The correlation analysis of Nurses Alarm Fatigue Scale showed that all entries-total score were significantly related.The item content validity index(I-CVI)were 0.830~1.000,the scale content validity index S-CVI/UA was 0.860 and S-CVI/Ave was 0.970.The three-factor structural equation model was obtained by exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 77.645%.Structural factor analysis performed on the model showed CMIN/DF<3,GFI、TLI、CFI>0.90 all,RMSEA<0.08,PGFI>0.50.The Cronbach a coefficient was 0.883,Cronbach a coefficient of the three dimensions was 0.876,0.882 and 0.755 respectively,mine-half reliability coefficient was 0.769,and correlation coefficient in the retelling group was 0.795.Conclusion The Chinese version of NAFS(NAFS-C)had good reliability and validity,which can be used to evaluate the status of nurse alarm fatigue in ICU in China,thus providing a new and more convenient tool for the management.
作者 冯笑 章左艳 唐雯琦 FENG Xiao;ZHANG Zuoyan;TANG Wenqi(the Sixth People′s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200030,China)
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS 2021年第1期113-117,共5页 Chongqing medicine
基金 上海交通大学护理高原项目(Hlgy1916kygg)。
关键词 报警疲乏 信度 效度 alarm fatigue reliability validity
作者简介 冯笑(1991-),护师,硕士,主要从事危重症护理;通信作者:章左艳,E-mail:zhang_zy1969@163.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献54

  • 1Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 2Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 3Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 4Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 5Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 6Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 7Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 8Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.
  • 9Nora JJ.Causes old and new modes,mechanisms and models.Am Heart J,1993,125:1409
  • 10Hoffman JIE.Congenital heart disease:incidence and inheritance.Ped Clin North Am,1990,37:25

共引文献1595

同被引文献32

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部