摘要
本文试图为知识归赋中的实用侵入进行辩护。首先,按照对"侵入"界定标准的不同,可分为弱和强两个版本,它们各自受到来自理智主义和实用主义的异议。对于前者,可以从确立论题合理性、证明论证形式成立两方面为其辩护;针对后者,基于直觉和知识模型建构,可诉诸思想案例和实验哲学。其次,本文主张从实用的、可错的、语境的角度来解决知识归赋问题,并以时间约束敏感性和认识的卓越为例,为进行知识分析提供了丰富的可支撑的证据。本文支持实用侵入而不认为它是对传统知识分析路径的背离。
This paper attempts to defend pragmatic encroachment.Firstly,it can be divided into two weak and strong versions according to the different criteria for defining‘encroach’,each of which is challenged by intellectualism and pragmatism.For the former,it can be defended from establishing the rationality of the thesis and proving the form of argument.Against the latter,we can resort to ideological cases and experimental philosophy to defend it based on intuition and knowledge model construction.Secondly,this paper proposes to solve the problem of knowledge attribution from a practical,fallibilist and contextualist perspective,and takes time-constraints sensitivity and epistemic excellence as examples to provide abundant supportive evidence for knowledge analysis.This paper supports pragmatic encroachment without considering it as a departure from the traditional path of knowledge analysis.
作者
方环非
沈怡婷
Fang Huanfei;Shen Yiting(School of Marxism,Ningbo University,Ningbo 315211)
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第10期101-107,159,共8页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“应用知识论研究”(批准号:18BZX100)
浙江省高校重大人文社科攻关计划项目“当代知识论中的实用主义进路研究”(批准号:2018GH015)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
实用侵入
语境主义
不变主义
时间约束敏感性
认识的卓越
pragmatic encroachment
contextualism
invariantism
time-constraints-sensitivity
epistemic excellence
作者简介
方环非,哲学博士,宁波大学马克思主义学院教授;沈怡婷,宁波大学马克思主义学院讲师,宁波315211。
