摘要
自1980年代以来,受"后现代"思潮影响的"新文化史"研究范式,逐渐居于各国史学主流。该范式关注"话语""文本""符号"和"象征",重点研究身体、性别、族裔和边缘人群,极大拓展了史学研究的领域和思想认识的多元化。不过,它带来的"碎片化"和"短时段"问题,也引发了当下史学界的诸多反思。作为一个补偿选项,是史学重回"长时段"的研究范式,探究那些致使历史演化的大过程、大趋势和大问题。再就马克思主义史学来说,"长时段"意味着对于"最贫苦、社会最下层的人的状况",予以更多义无反顾的关心和思虑。
Since 1980 s,the research paradigm of"new cultural history"influenced by the"post-modern"trend of thought had gradually occupied the mainstream of historiography in various countries.This paradigm focused on"discourse","text"and"symbol",studied the body,gender,ethnicity and marginal population,which greatly expanded the diversity of the field of historical research and ideological understanding.However,it brought about the problem of"fragmentation"and"short time",and it also triggered many reflections in the current history circles.As a compensation option,historiography reverted to the longterm research paradigm to explore the major processes,trends and problems that had led to the evolution of history.On Marxist historiography,the term"longue durée"meant more care and commitment to the situation of the poorest and the lowest-level people in society.
出处
《史林》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期197-207,222,共12页
Historical Review
作者简介
胡成,南京大学历史学院教授。
