摘要
作为我国行政诉讼证明标准通说的多元论存在适用混乱、内涵不清等弊端。行政诉讼证明标准具有独立性,应当建构统一的一般证明标准。我国行政诉讼的一般证明标准应以大陆法系通说的真实确信理论为其法理基础;以我国《行政诉讼法》第69条规定的"证据确凿"为制度资源,为其注入引自德国法的"法官心证达到实际生活中必要程度的确信,使心中怀疑沉默,但无需完全排除"之内涵,从而为我国行政诉讼建构内涵清晰的一般证明标准。在一般证明标准基础上,辅以提高或者降低一般证明标准的法理,从而形成以一般证明标准为中心的分层式证明标准,使我国由多元论转向一元分层论,能够在保证证明标准的法之安定性基础上,与证明标准的灵活性形成平衡。
As the dominant theory of the standard of proof in administrative litigation in China, the Pluralism has some defects such as disordered application and unclear connotation. The standard of proof in administrative litigation enjoys the independence, so a general standard of proof should be uniformly established. The general standard of proof in administrative litigation in China should be based on the real belief theory of civil law system. The general standard of proof with clear connotation in administrative litigation in China shall be established by taking the "conclusive evidence" stipulated in Article 69 of the Administrative Procedure Law as the institutional resource, and introducing the connotation that "the judges’ inner conviction reaches the necessary degree of belief in real life to make their suspicions silent which however it is unnecessary to completely exclude" from the German law to it. On the basis of the general standard of proof,with the help of jurisprudence on improving or reducing the general standard of proof, stratified standards of proof centering on the general standard of proof are formed, which turns the standard in China from Pluralism to Stratified Monism, and can achieve balance with the flexibility of the standard of proof on the basis of ensuring the stability of the law on the standard of proof.
出处
《政治与法律》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第12期124-139,共16页
Political Science and Law
关键词
证明标准
真实确信理论
证据确凿
一元分层论
廖宗荣案
Standard of Proof
Real Belief Theory
Conclusive Evidence
Stratified Monism
the Case of Liao Zongrong
作者简介
徐庭祥,西南政法大学刑事侦查学院讲师,法学博士。
