期刊文献+

“以审判为中心”背景下冤狱生成与避免研究——侦查机关“预审”职权设置的违宪性考察 被引量:2

On the Origin and Avoidance of Injustice on the Basis of “the Centre of the Jurisprudence”——The Unconstitutional Review of the Appointing of Criminal Investigation Institution to Prejudication
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对冤狱频现,有研究者尝试诉讼化改造刑事侦查。此思路限于以司法审查保障侦查权的合法行使。有人依此建议仿照当代西方控、辩、审构造中国审判模型。诸多冤狱及其昭雪途径的研究揭示,旧研究轻视冤狱生成机理讨论。刑侦人员的观点剖析揭示,侦查人员不别侦查权与审理权,频繁潜用审理职权。其自认能够认定犯罪本身是职权谬识,而此谬识是冤狱频发的根源。此等职权僭越出自《刑诉法》第114条"预审"职能设定,也出自人大网相关释义不够精准。《宪法》职能设置条款解读显示,"预审"设定不合宪法关于公安、检察、法院的职能划界。依此认识,建议删除不合宪法的偏利侦查机关的"预审"职能专条,并依其诉前任务修正此条文字。此修改将助推以审判为中心的司法审查体系的构建。 Facing the frequent occurring of injustices,many researchers have developed the idea of reforming the criminal investigation as per legal procedure.This line ends at the point that the investigation power should be lawfully guaranteed through the juridical review.According to this presumption,some of them are suggesting to build tripartite constellation,i.e.sue,defense,and judge.But the observing of many injustices and the discussions of their avoidance demonstrate that the former studies have scorned the discussion of the origin of injustice.The analysis of the opinions of the criminal detectives has discovered that these authors didn’t distinguish the power of investigation from that of jurisprudence.In reality,the investigation institution frequently make a quiet use of the jurisprudence power.Their theoretically unsupported confidence of cognizing guilty act builds the bud of injustice before criminal court.A close observation has revealed that the arrogation of the detectives stems from the arrangement of prejudication to the investigation institution by paragraph114of the Law of Criminal Procedure,as well as from the confusing explanation of this clause on the web page of the National People’s Congress.The reading of the paragraph on the power institutions in the Constitution of our country makes draw the conclusion that the institution of prejudication to the investigation does not conform to the separations of the public security,procuratorate and court.The suggestion of deleting of the prejudication clause has to be made therefore,covering the full range of the tasks of the investigation institution before the submitting of cases to the court.This act is being expected to strongly promote the reform of jurisprudence system.
作者 韩瑞芳 HAN Ruifang(Faculty of Public Security,Northwest University of Political and Law,Xi’an 710122,Shaanxi,China)
出处 《安康学院学报》 2018年第6期97-102,共6页 Journal of Ankang University
关键词 以审判为中心 冤狱之源 预审 悖理的职能设定 the centre of the jurisprudence origin of injustice prejudication irrational institution
作者简介 韩瑞芳,女,陕西礼泉人,西北政法大学公安学院副教授,主要从事刑事技术、刑法理论与比较法学等研究。
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献48

共引文献128

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部