期刊文献+

也谈体育赛事转播权法律性质界定的二分法——与冯春博士商榷 被引量:6

Further Talk about the "Dichotomy" of Defining Legal Attributes of Sports Broadcasting Rights——Discussing with Doctor FENG Chun
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 体育赛事转播权的法律性质界定一直存在较大争议。从多元复合化属性下的权利动态流转视角思考该问题具备一定新颖性,但也有着相应缺陷,且对界定体育赛事转播权法律性质的传统二分法存在误读。较之当前国内外其他主流观点,传统二分法仍更具合理性。针对传统二分法的局限,对它做了有限度修正。在直播权意义上转播权属于赛场准入权,在字面意义上转播权属于广播组织权。 The definition of legal nature of sports broadcast rights has always been controversial. To research this question from the angle of multiple attributes may have some innovation, but also have some defects. And there is a misreading of the traditional dichotomy which defines the legal nature of sports broadcast rights. Compared with current domestic and foreign mainstream point of view,the traditional dichotomy is more reasonable. This paper conducts limited amendment according to traditional dichotomy's limitations. In broadcast connotation,the right belongs to the right of access to the field and belongs to the right of broadcasting organization in the literal sense.
作者 欧阳爱辉
出处 《成都体育学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第4期66-71,共6页 Journal of Chengdu Sport University
关键词 体育赛事转播权 二分法 无形财产权 广播组织权 赛场准入权 sports broadcast rights dichotomy intangible property rights broadcasting organization rights right of access to the field
作者简介 欧阳爱辉,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向:经济法学,E-mail:basten2018@tom.com.
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献103

共引文献147

同被引文献120

引证文献6

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部