期刊文献+

MSCT肝包膜侵犯征象对肝癌微血管侵犯诊断价值研究 被引量:20

Radiologic Hepatic Capsular Invasion on MSCT in Prediction of Microvascular Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨MSCT肝包膜侵犯征象对肝癌微血管侵犯(MVI)的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析初诊经手术病理证实的单发肝癌132例,所有病例术前均行MSCT平扫及多期增强扫描。将MSCT肝包膜侵犯征象与手术病理结果进行对照分析。结果 MSCT肝包膜侵犯征象与病理肝包膜侵犯、肝癌MVI之间存在显著关联(P<0.01);MSCT肝包膜侵犯征象诊断肝癌MVI的敏感度、特异度、准确率分别为83.3%(40/48)、67.9%(57/84)、73.5%(97/132)。结论 MSCT肝包膜侵犯征象可以作为评估肝癌MVI的一种依据。 Objective The purpose of this retrospective study was to clarify the diagnostic value of radiologic hepatic capsular invasion on multiphasic MSCT for predicting the presence of microvascular invasion( MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma( HCC). Methods 132 patients with pathologically proved solitary hepatocellular carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. All cases were performed on a multiphasic 64-MSCT scanner before operation. Radiologic evidences of hepatic capsular invasion were compared with surgical histopathology results. Results Radiologic hepatic capsular invasion was closely correlated with the presence of MVI and hepatic capsular invasion in histopathology. The presence of radiologic hepatic capsular invasion had a sensitivity of 83. 3%( 40/48),a specificity of 67. 9%( 57/84),and an accuracy rate of73. 5%( 97/132) in predicting MVI. Conclusion The characteristics of hepatic capsular invasion on preoperative CT scans is a simple and effective noninvasive technique for detecting MVI.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期838-840,共3页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
基金 广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(编号:桂科攻1355005-3-1) 广西卫生和计划生育委员会自筹经费科研项目(编号:Z2016476) 2017年广西研究生教育创新计划项目资助(编号:YCBZ2017042)
关键词 MSCT 肝癌 肝包膜侵犯 微血管侵犯 MSCT Hepatocellular carcinoma Hepatic capsular invasion Microvascular invasion
作者简介 通讯作者 通讯作者
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献30

  • 1马海,王宇,杨红春,田云鸿.预测肝癌微血管侵犯及早期复发的临床研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(20):58-60. 被引量:9
  • 2庞家宝.甲胎蛋白诊断原发性肝癌的局限性[J].中国误诊学杂志,2006,6(5):875-876. 被引量:15
  • 3石木兰.月中瘤影像学[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:237-260.
  • 4Bosniak MA. Problems in the radiologic diagnosis of renal parenchymal tumors. Urol Clin North Am, 1993, 20:217.
  • 5Apaydin FD, Ozer C, Duce MN,et al. Comparison of reliabilities of the delayed images of helical renal CT in detecting small renal masses. Clin Imaging, 2003, 27:112.
  • 6Herts BR. Imaging for renal tumors. Curr Opin Urol, 2003, 13: 181.
  • 7Sheth S, Scatarige JC, Horton KM,et al. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma: role of multidetector CT and three-dimensional CT. Radiographics, 2001, 21:237.
  • 8Brian IY, Richard HC. Different phases of renal enhancement: role in detecting and characterizing renal masses during helical CT. AJR, 1999, 173:747.
  • 9Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Watanabe O,et al. Small renal cell carcinoma: pathologic and rediologic correlation. Radiology, 1992, 184:493.
  • 10Yamashita Y, Honda S, Nishiharu T,et al. Detection of pseudocapsule of renal cell carcinoma with MR imaging and CT. AJR, 1996, 166:1151.

共引文献139

同被引文献129

引证文献20

二级引证文献115

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部