摘要
以系统论的综合性观点来看,"语言联盟"模型更适切地构拟了藏缅语的历史关系。语序上,彝缅语和藏-景颇语相似度较低,以名-数-量(N-Num-CL)语序、动-数-量(V-Num-CL)语序和否定词-形容词(Neg-A)语序为主要分类标准。嘉羌语是过渡语言,相对来说与彝缅语相似度高一些,它们之间以动-数-量(V-Num-CL)语序和否定词-形容词(Neg-A)语序作为主要分类标准。
From the synthetic perspective, we argue that the ＂Language Alliance＂ model is suitable for reconstructing the historical relationships among contemporary Tibeto-Burmans. Taken the word order as an examplary criterion, we conclude that largely by the linear order of noun-numeral-classifier（N-Num-CL）, verb-numeral-classifier（V-Num-CL） and negative-adjective（Neg-A）, Yi-Burmans and Tibeto-Jinghpo languages are far apart. r Gyalrong ＆ Qiangic languages fall in right between them, slightly slanting towards Yi-Burmans. But we can still split apart the r Gyalrong ＆ Qiangic languages from Yi-Burmans, mainly by the linear order of verb-numeral-classifier（V-Num-CL） and negative-adjective（Neg-A）.
出处
《语言研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第2期118-127,共10页
Studies in Language and Linguistics
作者简介
柳俊，男，1981年生，上海人，在站博士后，主要从事东南亚区域类型学研究。
