摘要
目的观察循经取穴与非经非穴治疗餐后不适综合征(PDS)型功能性消化不良的临床疗效。方法 68例PDS型患者随机分为循经取穴(A组)与非经非穴(B组)两组,每组34例。A组针刺足三里及内关穴,同时根据中医虚实辨证,实证加用太冲、内庭,予针刺补法;虚证加用公孙、阴陵泉,予针刺泻法;B组在上述经穴旁2cm处针刺,并根据辨证虚实分别采用相应补泻手法。分别对两组治疗前后的临床疗效进行评价并随访6个月。结果A组与B组治疗前后的总疗效及尼平消化不良指数(NDI)评分比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论循经取穴治疗PDS型功能性消化不良疗效确切,优于非经非穴治疗。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of selecting acupoints along channel and the non-channel and non-acupoint for treating functional dyspepsia postprandial distress syndrome （PDS）. Methods A total of 68 cases of PDS were randomly divided into the selecting acupoint along channel group （group A） and the non-channel and non-acupoint group （group B）, 34 cases in each group. The group A was acupunctured at the Zusanli point and Neiguan point. At the same time according to the Deficiency and Excess pattern discrimination,the Taichong and Neiting points were added by the acupuncture tonifying method for the Excess pattern,while the Gongsun and Yinlingquan points were added by the acupuncture reducing method for the Deficiency pattern;in group the B,the area at 2 cm besides the above points were acupunctured and the tonifying and reducing methods were adopted based on the Deficiency and Excess pattern discrimination. The clinical effects before and after treatment were evaluated in the two groups and the 6-month follow-up was conducted. Results The total effect and the NDI scores before and after treatment had sta- tistical difference between the group A and B（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Selecting aeupoint along channel is definitely effective for treating functional dyspepsia PDS,and is better than the non-channel and non-acupoint treatment.
出处
《重庆医学》
CAS
北大核心
2015年第14期1918-1920,共3页
Chongqing medicine
关键词
功能性消化不良
循经取穴
非经非穴
临床疗效
functional dyspepsia
selecting acupoint along channel
non-channel and non-acupoint
clinical efficacy
作者简介
王佳佳（1988-），硕士，主要从事中西医结合临床研究工作。
通讯作者，E—mail：cyrxf@163．com。
