期刊文献+

刑法身份的实质客观论 被引量:1

Substantive Objectivist Theory of Identity in Criminal Law
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 客观属性系刑法身份本质内涵。刑法身份由构成身份与责任身份组成。犯罪论体系影响构成身份性质,三阶层构成要件论体系是构成身份成立的理论基础。身份依附于行为人,行为人系构成要件要素,构成要件系违法行为类型,构成身份分为构成的违法、责任身份。身份法益侵害危险系违法身份本质;理论上身份非难可能性系构成的责任身份之本质,但身份不能为非难对象与且有责性本质相悖,故该身份不存在,构成身份系违法身份。责任身份影响刑罚轻重,系量刑情节,刑罚目的系其存在根据。刑法身份由违法身份与责任身份构成。 Objectivity is the essential connotation of identity in criminal law, which partly recognizes the element of subjective identity according to the necessity of penalty.Identity in criminal law consists of constitutive identity and accountability identity.The system of criminal theory is related to the nature of identity, and the three-tier system of Tatbestand serves as the theoretical basis of constitutive identity.I-dentity is possessed by the actor, who is also a constitutive element of crime.The constitutive elements of crime define the illegality of a crime, and thus the element of the actor’s identity should include two aspects:illegal action and capacity of accountability.The nature of the constitutive element of identity lies in its danger of infringing others’legal interests.Although the identity cannot be the object of ac-countability because of its contradiction to the essence of accountability, theoretically accountability i-dentity is a false concept.So identity as a constitutive element can be nothing but a cause for unlawful-ness.Accountability identity, however, plays an important role in determining penalty.It belongs to cir-cumstances for sentencing, and the aim of penalty accounts for its existence.Thus, identity in criminal law is composed of illegality identity ( i.e.identity leading to illegality) and accountability identity.
作者 杜宣
机构地区 东南大学法学院
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期47-56,共10页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 违法身份 (构成的)责任身份 犯罪论体系 实质客观论 illegality identity ( constitutive) accountability identity system of criminal theory theo-ry of substantive objectivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

  • 1周光权.论刑法学中的规范违反说[J].环球法律评论,2005,27(2):166-174. 被引量:46
  • 2黎宏.判断行为的社会危害性时不应考虑主观要素[J].法商研究,2006,23(1):99-107. 被引量:49
  • 3黎宏.行为无价值论批判[J].中国法学,2006(2):160-173. 被引量:65
  • 4冯军译.“德国波恩州法院关于一起故意杀人未遂案的判决书”,载冯军主编.《比较刑法研究》,中国人民大学出版社2007年版,页443以下.
  • 5(德)雅科布斯.“刑法教义学中的规范化理论”,载《现代刑事法治问题探索》(第1卷),法律出版社2004年版,页86.
  • 6黄荣坚.基础刑法学(下)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.
  • 7[日]山口厚.刑法各论(第2版)[M].王昭武译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.410.
  • 8[日]山口厚.刑法总论(第2版)[M].付立庆译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011:44.
  • 9[德]冈特.施特拉腾韦特,洛塔尔.库伦.刑法总论I——犯罪论[M].杨萌,译.北京:法律出版社,2006.
  • 10甘添贵.体系刑法各论_第二卷.侵害个人非专属法益之犯罪[M].台北:自版,2004.

共引文献200

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部