摘要
"中国研究"在西方学术界已走过六十年历史,期间经历了若干次的研究范式反思与重构。但关于中国常被集体性解读为单一性的"乡土中国"这一现象仍未提升到这些反思或重构的学术中心,城市或城市中国是不在场的。它的话语逻辑,仍是西方以及西方学术界对中国研究的霸权。当下,城市拆迁与业主维权等有关城市化运动的两幅图景正在重塑"国家—社会"关系,但遗憾的是,"国家—社会"这一理论框架在海外中国研究中又遭受到了质疑。相对于已形成研究路径依赖的西方学者来说,中国学者对于中国城市化运动在学术上更敏感,将是找回中国研究主体性的一次机遇。
China Studies as a social science has a history of more than 60 years and had been reflected and reconstructed in research paradigms. However, in most researches, China has been studied as a single ＂Rural China＂ instead of including ＂Urban China＂. The logic of discourse in this academic phenomenon is a historical fact that China Studies are still been unfolded under an academic hegemony by western societies and their researchers. In contemporary urban China, ＂city demolitions＂ and ＂collective actions of urban house owners＂ are reconstructing the changing relationship between state and society. But unfortunately, this relationship as a theoretical framework had been called into question in western China Studies. Compared to western researchers who rely on a fixed study path, Chinese social scientists are more sensitive to China＇s urbanization and may find their subjective role in the area of China Studies.
出处
《城市观察》
2015年第2期158-166,共9页
Urban Insight
关键词
城市化
城市中国
中国研究
主体性
urbanization
urban China
China studies
subjective role
作者简介
罗东，武汉大学社会学系硕士研究生。
