我国各省高校人文社科科研效率评价及区域差异研究被引量：19

Study on Research Efficiency of Humanities and Social Sciences in Universities of Different Provinces and Regional Differences

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要基于DEA分析方法,对我国除西藏外30个省份高校2001-2011年每年的人文社科科研效率及其区域差异情况进行评价分析。认为,各省高校人文社科研究技术效率、纯技术效率和规模效率平均值较高,但随着时间的推移有下降趋势;不同省份高校人文社科科研效率差异巨大,无明显规律;区域对比看,每年的技术效率、纯技术效率基本都是东部大于西部和中部,具有可观察到的区域差异,而同期间的规模效率无明显区域差别。 In this paper,the DEA analysis method is used to evaluate the annual research efficiency of humanities and so-cial science in universities of China＆#39;s 30 provinces except Tibet in 2001 -2011.Some conclusions are found.Firstly,re-search technical efficiency,pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency of humanities and social science are very high in this phase,but the efficiency has a downward trend with the time going on;Secondly,technical efficiency in universities of 30 provinces is significant different in 2001 -201 1 without apparent discipline;Thirdly,annual technical efficiency,pure technical efficiency scores in eastern are basically higher than those of western and central,and regional differences can be observed;Lastly,there is no significant regional difference of the scale efficiency in the same period.

作者姜彤彤

机构地区山东师范大学经济学院

出处《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第15期92-96,123,共6页 Science and Technology Management Research

基金教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目"中国高校人文社科科研效率评价及影响因素研究"(13YJCZH064)

关键词高校人文社科科研效率区域差异 university humanities and social sciences research efficiency regional differences

分类号 G644 [文化科学—高等教育学] G311 [文化科学]

作者简介姜彤彤（1978-），女，山东蒙阴人，教师，副教授，管理学博士，主要研究方向政府与非营利组织财务管理。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献24

1BEASLEY J E. Determining the teaching and research efficiencies [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1995 (4) : 441 - 452.
2ATHANASSOPOULOS A D, SHALE E. Assessing the comparative effi- ciency of higher education institutions in the UK by means of data envel- opment analysis [J]. Education Economics, 1997 (2): 117-134.
3NG Y C, LI S K. Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions: An application of data envelopment a- nalysis [J]. Education Economics, 2000 (2): 139-156.
4LOPES A L M, LANZER E A. DEA and fuzzy sets to assess the per- formance of academic departments: A case study at Federal University of Santa Catarina [J]. Pesquisa Ooeracional. 2002 (2) : 217 -230.
5ABBOTT M, DOUCOULIAGOS C. The efficiency of Australian uni- versities: A data envelopment analysis [ J]. Economics of Education Review, 2003 ( 1 ) : 89 - 97.
6FENG Y J, LU H, BI K. An AHP/DEA method for measurement of the efficiency of R&D management activities in universities [ J ]. Inter- national Transaction in Operational Research, 2004 (11) : 181 - 191.
7JOHNES J, YU L. Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis [ J ]. China Economic Review, 2008 (4) : 679 - 696.
8KUAH C T, WONG K Y. Efficiency assessment of universities through data envelopment analysis [ J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2011 (3):499-506.
9JOHNES G, JOHNES J. Measuring the research performance of UK e- conomics departments: An application of data envelopment analysis [J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 1993 (2) : 332 -347.
10JOHNES G, JOHNES J. Research funding and performance in UK university departments of economics : A frontier analysis [ J ]. Economics of Education Review, 1995 (3) : 301 - 314.