期刊文献+

熟悉性与回想分离的新证据 被引量:3

The New Evidence for Dissociations between Familiarity and Recollection
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 人们常常发现自己对某一情景有些熟悉,但又想不起以前有关的经历。对这种熟悉感的理论解释,一种观点认为熟悉感来自一种较弱的记忆形式,与有回忆情况下的再认属于同一加工过程(single-process models,SPM)。另一种观点则认为,熟悉感来自一种基于熟悉性的再认,与基于回想的再认相互独立(dual-process theories,DPT)。在实验室,评估熟悉性与回想是否相互独立的基本方法是寻找两者分离的证据。本文尝试梳理无线索回忆再认(recognition without cued recall,RWCR)范式的研究,结果显示:熟悉性对某种特殊的概念加工和整体特征的知觉加工要比回想更加敏感,并没有支持SPM关于回想和熟悉性各自对意义加工和局部特征的知觉加工更加敏感的推断。而且RWCR研究还观测到熟悉性与回想在行为和神经成像方面的实验性分离,支持了DPT关于熟悉性与回想相互独立的推断。最后,本文从熟悉性的深层机制和中英文材料对RWCR的不同影响出发,对未来研究提出展望。 People often find themselves in a situation something seems a bit familiar to them, yet they fail to recall the related experience that happened in their lives before.. One theoretical explanation for the feelings of familiarity is that they result from a weaker form of the same process that produces recognition that occurs in the presence of recall (single-process models, SPM). An alternative theoretical explanation is that the feelings of familiarity result from the familiarity-based recognition that operates independently to the recollection-based recognition (dual-process theories, DPT). In the laboratory, the primary method of assessing the independence of recollection and familiarity is to look for dissociations between the two. In this article, attempt is made to tease apart the studies of recognition without cued recall paradigm (RWCRP). The results indicate that familiarity is more-sensitive to some special conceptual and global-feature perceptual processes than recollection, thus rejecting the claim of SPM in showing that recollection and familiarity are preferentially sensitive to conceptual and partial-feature perceptual manipulations, respectively. And the behavioral and neuropsychological dissociations between recollection and familiarity are also observed by RWCR studies, which provide some support for this claim of DPT in showing that recollection and familiarity are mutually independent. Finally, the future research is put forward as to that the underlying processing mechanism of familiarity could be studied and Chinese words could be examined using RWCR method due to the difference between English and Chinese.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第7期1122-1128,共7页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(31271090) 上海市教委科研创新重点项目(12ZS046) 国家社会科学基金教育类国家青年课题(CBA120104)
关键词 似曾相识 无线索回忆再认 熟悉性 再认记忆 再认的双加工理论 deja vu recognition without cued recall familiarity recognition memory dual-process models of recognition
作者简介 通讯作者:郭秀艳,E-mail:wlkc-xyguo@126.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1郭秀艳.再认中意识和无意识的贡献大小——兼论内隐记忆的抗老化现象[J].心理科学,2002,25(5):535-537. 被引量:11
  • 2梁九清,郭春彦.跨领域项目间联结记忆中项目提取和关系提取的分离:一项事件相关电位研究[J].心理学报,2012,44(5):625-633. 被引量:15
  • 3李岩松,周仁来.再认记忆双加工的理论模型及研究方法[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,44(3):243-246. 被引量:12
  • 4Addante, R. J., Ranganath, C., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2012). Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: Evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection. Neuroimage, 62(1), 439-450.
  • 5Aly, M., Ranganath, C., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2014). Neural correlates of state-and strength-based perceptions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 792-809.
  • 6Brown, A. S. (2003). A review of the d6j: vu experience. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 394-413.
  • 7Brown, M. W., & Aggleton, J. E (2001). Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(1), 51-61.
  • 8Cleary, A. M., & Greene, R. L. (2001). Memory for unidentified items: Evidence for the use of letter information in familiarity processes. Memory & Cognition, 29(3), 540-545.
  • 9Cleary, A. M., Ryals, A. J., & Nomi, J. S. (2009). Can d6jh vu result from similarity to a prior experience? Support for the similarity hypothesis of ddj:t vu. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(6), 1082-1088.
  • 10Cleary, A. M., & Specker, L. E. (2007). Recognition without face identification. Memory & Cognition. 35(7), 1610-1619.

二级参考文献19

  • 1杨治良,叶奕乾,祝蓓里,高月梅,李敏.再认能力最佳年龄的研究——试用信号检测论分析[J].心理学报,1981,13(1):42-52. 被引量:16
  • 2Lori E. james & Deborah M. Burke Phonological Priming Effects on Word Retrieval and Tip-of-the-Tongue Experiences in Young and Older Adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2000; 26:1378 - 1391
  • 3中国心理学会.当代中国心理学.北京:人民教育出版社.2001:28-31
  • 4Jason L. Hicks & Richard L. Marsh Toward Specifying the Attentional Demands of Recognition Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2000 ;26:1483 - 1498
  • 5Moshe Naveh-Benjamin Adult Age Differences in Memory Performance: Tests of an Associative Deficit Hypothesis.Journal of experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2000; 26:1170 - 1187
  • 6Anne M. Cleary & Robert L. Greene Recognition Without Identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2000; 26:1063 - 1069
  • 7Rugg M D,Yonelinas A P.Human recognition memory:a cognitive neuroscience perspective[J].Trends in Cogn Sci,2003(7):313.
  • 8Atkinson R C,Juola J F.Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition[C]∥Kornblum S.Fourth international symposium on attention and performance.New York:Academic Press,1973:583-611.
  • 9Atkinson R C,Juola J F.Search and decision processes in recognition memory[C]∥Krantz D H,Atkinson R C,Luce R D,et al.Learning,Memory & Thinking.San Francisco:Freeman,1974.
  • 10Mayes A R,Meudell P R,Pickering A.Is organic amnesia caused by a selective deficit in remembering contextual information?[J].Cortex,1985,21(2):167.

共引文献35

同被引文献84

  • 1郭秀艳.再认中意识和无意识的贡献大小——兼论内隐记忆的抗老化现象[J].心理科学,2002,25(5):535-537. 被引量:11
  • 2孟迎芳,郭春彦.内隐记忆和外显记忆的ERP分离与联系[J].科学通报,2007,52(17):2021-2028. 被引量:20
  • 3R. C. ATKINSON, J. F. JUOLA. Factors Influencing Speed and Accuracy of Word Recognition. In S. KORN- BLUM (Ed.). Fourth International Symposium on At- tention and Performance. New York: Academic Press, 1973: 583--611.
  • 4R. C. ATKINSON, J. F. JUOLA. Search and Decision Processes in Recognition Memory. In D. H. KRANTZ, R. C. ATKINSON, R. D. LUCE, et al (Eds.). Con- temporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology: Vol. 1. Learning, Memory & Thinking. San Francisco: Freeman, 1974:243--293.
  • 5L. L. JACOBY. A Process Dissociation Framework: Sep- arating Automatic from Intentional Uses of Memory. Jour- nal of Memory and Language, 1991,30(5) : 513--541.
  • 6L. L. JACOBY, M. DALLAS. On the Relationship Be- tween Autobiographical Memory and Perceptual Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1981, 110 : 306--340.
  • 7G. MANDLER. Organization and Repetition: Organiza- tional Principles with Special Reference to Rote Learning.In L. G. NILSSON (Ed.). Perspectives on Memory Re- search. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1979:293--327.
  • 8G. MANDLER. Recognizing: The Judgment of Previous Occurrence. Psychological Review, 1980, ( 3 ) : 252-- 271.
  • 9A. P. YONELINAS. Receiver-operating Characteristics in Recognition Memory : Evidence for a Dual - process mod- el. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Mem- ory, and Cognition, 1994, (6): 1341--1354.
  • 10A. P. YONELINAS. Recognition Memory ROCs for Item and Associative Information : The Contribution of Recollec- tion and Familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 1997, 25 : 747--763.

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部