期刊文献+

面向新工科的交叉研究平台构建与有效运行 被引量:8

The Construction and Operation of the Interdisciplinary Studies Platform Applied to Emerging Engineering
原文传递
导出
摘要 自"复旦共识"以来,围绕新工科主题的理论与实践研究已成为工程教育领域甚至是多类交叉学科关注的重点和热点,大量研究一方面强调传统工科的转型升级,另一方面则强调诸如"大数据""人工智能"等新兴学科平台的建设,各类学术研讨会中也突出强调了新工科实践方案和路径的思考。本文聚焦于面向新工科方向的交叉研究平台的构建与有效运行等问题,首先对交叉研究平台研究热点的变化趋势进行文献分析;其次应用案例研究方法,对MIT和斯坦福大学的跨学科研究机构进行案例挖掘,归纳提炼了其建设思路、运行机制和管理模式等特征;最后,本研究提出对我国新工科实践方案中新型交叉研究平台建设的启示与建议,希望能促进新工科实践路径真正走向通途。 Since the Fudan Consensus was achieved,the researches on the emerging engineering educa- tion have drawn increasing attention from the field of engineering education and other interdisciplinary field.The researches not only focus on the transformation and reform of traditional engineering,but also concentrate on the construction of some emerging disciplinary platforms,such as big data and artificial intelligence.In academic conferences,the practice plan and methods of emerging engineering education have also been discussed.This paper mainly discusses the construction and operation of the platform of interdisciplinary studies which will.be applied to the emerging engineering.This paper,at first,studies the trend of researches on the platform of interdisciplinary studies,based on the literature review.Then,through a case 'study of the interdisciplinary institutions in MIT and Stanford University,this paper summarizes those institutions'construction ideas,operation mechanism and management mode.Finally,this paper,puts forward the suggestions'for the construction of the platform of interdisciplinary studies in China.
作者 袁清 陈婵 Yuan Qing;Chen Chan
出处 《高等工程教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期33-38,共6页 Research in Higher Education of Engineering
基金 浙江省教育厅重大项目"高等学校独立研究机构体制机制创新研究"(Y201330311)
关键词 跨学科研究 交叉研究平台 研究型大学 新工科 interdisciplinary research platform of interdisciplinary studies research-oriented university emerging engineering education
作者简介 袁清,浙江大学社会科学研究院副院长、副研究员;陈婵,浙江大学社会科学研究院科研管理部部长、博士
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献62

  • 1顾佩华,沈民奋,李升平,庄哲民,陆小华,熊光晶.从CDIO到EIP-CDIO——汕头大学工程教育与人才培养模式探索[J].高等工程教育研究,2008,56(1):12-20. 被引量:808
  • 2National Academies.Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press,2005.
  • 3Irwin Feller. Interdiseiplinarity: Paths taken and not taken. Change, Nov/Dec2007,Vol.39 Issue 6.
  • 4Stanford Doresearch. Interdisciplinary Laboratories, Cen-ters? and Institutes. [2013-10-20]. https: // doresearch.Stanford, edu/research-scholarship/interdisciplinary-labora-tories-centers-and-institutes, 2013.
  • 5Stanford University. Research. [2013-10-13]. http: //www. Stanford, edu/research/, 2013.
  • 6Stanford Doresearch,Policies. [2013-10-20]. https;// doresearch, Stanford, edu/policies/research-policy-hand-book/establishing-and-managing-independent-laboratories-institutes-an-0, 2013.
  • 7Stanford Doresearch. Dean's Office Support for the Independ-ent Labs, Institutes, and Centers. [2013-10-20]. https: //doresearch. Stanford, edu/research-offices/office-vice-prov-ost-and-dean-research/deans-office-support-independent-labs’ 2013.
  • 8SIERP. Advisory Board. [2013-10-23]. http: // siepr. Stan-ford. edu/advisory- board, 2013.
  • 9SIMES. Key Partnerships. [2013-10-23]. http: // simes.Stanford, edu/about-simes/key-partnerships/, 2013.
  • 10Stanford University. Faculty Handbook. [2013-09-28]http: // facultyhandbook. Stanford. edu/ch2. html # senior,2013.

共引文献704

同被引文献80

引证文献8

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部