摘要
自治规则是在政治国家与市民社会的分野中实现多元化社会治理的必然路径,无论是体现私法自治精神,还是通过公法授权而形成的自治规则,均有可能对其内部成员和外部第三人的合法权益构成侵害。对《最高人民法院公报》案例的梳理表明,法院在适用自治规则做出侵权裁判时常将其作为行为人过错判断的具体化标准,因而在自治规则与注意义务之间建立了关联。在没有法律明确规定的情形下,对于自治规则的适用同样会带来侵权法保护利益范围的扩张。
Self- governing rule is an inevitable choice to fulfill the multi -layered social governance under the circumstance of civil society separating from political country, and all the self - governing rules, whether it＇ s from autonomy of private law or empowered by public law, can inflict civil harm both on the inner members and outsiders of the self - governing organization. The collating of the tort cases published by the Supreme Court of China indicates that courts usually take the disobedience of self - governing rule as fault of the defend- ants in tort adjudications,which means self - governing rule is to some extent related to duty of care, further- more the application of self - governing rule enlarges the protection range of tort law in the absence of positive legal regulations.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第5期65-75,共11页
Law and Social Development
基金
江苏省研究生培养创新工程基金项目"金融消费者保护机制研究"(CXZZ12_0008)
关键词
自治规则
过错
注意义务
纯经济上损失
self - governing rule
fault
duty of care
pure economic loss
作者简介
马辉（1981-），男，河南许昌人，南京大学法学院博士研究生、伊犁师范学院法政学院教师。
