期刊文献+

厂商动态竞争性差别定价和竞争优势实现——基于消费者寻求多样化购买行为的分析 被引量:26

Competitive dynamic discriminatory pricing and realization of competitive advantage: An analysis based on consumers' variety-seeking behavior
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着信息技术的发展,厂商可以根据消费者的历史购买信息实施差别定价.该文主要研究相互竞争的厂商基于消费者的购买历史实行差别定价的本质特征和形成机制,以及实施这种定价策略能否在竞争中获取竞争优势.分析结果显示,在竞争性差别定价均衡中,消费者寻求多样化购买是厂商实施差别定价的内在原因,厂商在第2期通过给予价格优惠吸引消费者重复购买,对忠诚的消费者给予奖励,并在第1期弱化竞争,导致两期竞争存在"默契合谋",消费者寻求多样化购买成为竞争厂商利润的源泉;如果厂商能够比竞争对手率先实施差别定价的营销策略,那么就能在竞争中获取优势.另外,清晰地刻画了竞争性差别定价均衡存在且唯一的充分条件.该文的研究结果可以很好地解释现实经济中许多厂商的定价竞争策略行为,对于厂商的产品营销战略具有重要的指导意义. As the information technology develops, firms can tract consumers' purchase history and carry out price discriminations based on those information. In this paper, we investigate how such information can be u- tilized by firms in a dynamic (two-stage) duopoly model. We show that consumer' s variety seeking behavior is the main reason for the firms to discriminate consumers. Specifically, firms need to charge loyal consumers a lower price and therefore, a larger market share in the first period is relatively less attractive. As a result, the first period competition is alleviated which leads to "tacit collusion". This shows that consumers' variety seeking behavior is the source of firms' profits. We also provide a sufficient condition for the existence and u- niqueness of the equilibrium. In addition, we show that a firm, who can engage in price discrimination, can gain advantages if his opponent cannot. Our dustry and membership (discount) cards in product marketing strategies. findings provide explanations for frequent flyer plans in airline in- retail stores. The results have important implications in firms'
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期44-53,共10页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172139) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助项目(NCET-10-0560) 上海市曙光计划资助项目(09SG33) 上海市社科规划资助项目(01FJB002)
关键词 寻求多样化购买行为 滞留成本 差别定价 营销策略 variety-seeking behavior staying cost discriminatory pricing marketing strategy
作者简介 作者简介:蒋传海(1970-),男,安徽濉溪人,博士,教授,博士生导师.Email:zhjiang@mail.shufe.edu.cn
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Brickman P, D' Amto B. Exposure effects in a fri-choice situation[ J J. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32 (3) : 415 -420.
  • 2I Coombs C, Avrunin G S. Single peaked preference functions and theory of preference[ J ]. Psychological Review, 1977, 84 (2) : 216 -230.
  • 3Raju P S. Optimal stimulation level: It' s relationship to personality, demographics and exploratory behavior[ J ]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1980, 7 (3): 272-282.
  • 4Ratner R K, Kahn B E, Kahneman D. Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety[ J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1999, 26 (1) : 1 -15.
  • 5Givon M. Variety seeking through brand switching[J]. Marketing Science, 1984, 3 (1) : 1 -21.
  • 6Kahn B E, Kalwani M U, Morrison D G. Measuring variety-seeking and reinforcement behaviors using panel data[ J ]. Jour- nal of Marketing Research, 1986, 23 (2) : 89 -100.
  • 7Seetharaman P B. Modeling multiple sources of state dependence in random utility models: A distributed lag approach [ J ]. Marketing Science, 2004, 23 (2) : 263 -271.
  • 8Jeuland A P. Brand preference over time : A partially deterministic operationalization of the notion of variety seeking [ C ]/! Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, 43, AMA Educators' Proceedings, Chicago: American Market- ing Association, 1978.
  • 9McAlister L A. Dynamic attribute satiation model of variety-seeking behavior[ J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1982, 9 (2) : 213 -224.
  • 10Seetharaman P B, Che H. Price competition in markets with consumer variety seeking[ J]. Marketing Science, 2009, 28 (3) : 516 -525.

二级参考文献44

  • 1唐小我.二度价格歧视情形下垄断厂商收益最大化条件[J].电子科技大学学报,1997,26(2):194-198. 被引量:45
  • 2Caminal R. ,and Matute C., 1989, "Endogenous Switching Costs in a Duopoly Model", Journal oflndustrial Organization, vol. 8, 353-- 373.
  • 3Chen Y., 1997, "Paying Customers to Switch", Journal of Econamics and Management Strategy, vol. 6, 877--897.
  • 4Chen Y., 2005, "Oligopoly Price Discrimination by Purchase History", The Pros and Cons of Price Discrimination, 101--29.
  • 5Doganoglu T., and Grzybowski L., 2004, "Dynamic Duopoly Competition with Switching Costs and Network Externalities", Mimeo.
  • 6Farrell J., and Klemperer P., 2002, "Coordination and Lock--In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects", Handbook of Industrial Organization.
  • 7Fudenberg J., and Tirole J., 2000, "Customer Poaching and Brand Switching", Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, 634--657.
  • 8Katz M. and Shapiro C. , 1985, "Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility", American Eeonomic Review, vol. 75, No. 3, 424-- 440.
  • 9Klemperer P., 1987a, "Markets With Consumer Switching Costs", Qnarterly Journal ofEconamlcs , 31, 123--137.
  • 10Klemperer P. , 1987b, "The Competitiveness of Markets with Switching Costs", Rand Journal of Economics, vol 18, 138--150.

共引文献184

同被引文献178

引证文献26

二级引证文献170

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部