摘要
对构成要件的解释不能停留在法条的字面含义上,必须以保护法益为指导,使行为的违法性与有责性达到值得科处刑罚的程度;在遵循罪刑法定原则的前提下,可以做出扩大解释,以实现处罚的妥当性。在解释构成要件时,不能脱离案件事实;在遇到法律疑问时,不能将有利于被告人作为解释原则。实质解释论同时维护罪刑法定主义的形式侧面与实质侧面,既有利于实现处罚范围的合理性,也有利于实现构成要件的机能。
literal interpretation to the constitutional requirements of a crime is not enough,the governingprinciple of legal interest protectionshould be applied to make the illegality and the culpability of an act described in criminal law worthy of punishment;with the precondition of abiding by the principle of＂nullum crimen sine lege,nulla poena sine lege＂,an amplified interpretation can be accepted to ensure the validity ofpunishment.An Interpretaion should not be separated from the facts;an interpretation should not be made under the principle of＂pro defendente at unsettled points＂when the stipulation is obscure.The principle of essential interpretation,defending both the formal and the essential aspects of the principle of ＂nullum crimensine lege,nulla poena sine lege＂,is not only good for the certainty of a reasonable range of punishment,butfor the fulfillment of the function of the constitutional requirements.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第4期49-69,共21页
China Legal Science
作者简介
清华大学法学院教授、博士生导师。
