1A. P. Fagen, C. H. Crouch, and E. Mazur. Peer Instruction: Results froma range of classroom, Phys. Teach. 2002, 40, 206.
2C. H. Crouch and E. Mazur. Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. Am. J. Phys. 2001,69, 970.
3Clicker Resouse Guide: Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative University of British Columbia , http://www. cwsei. ubc. ca/resources/instructor_guidance, htm.
4Lasry, N. Clickers or flashcards: Is there really a difference. Phys. Teacher, 2008,46,242-244.
5DAVIDJ. NICOL,JAMEST. BOYLE, Peer Instruction versus Class wide Discussion in Large Classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom Studies in Higher Education. 2003,28(4):457.
6N. W. Reay, Pengfei Li, and Lei Bao. Testing a new voting machine question methodology. Am. J. Phys. 2008,76 (2):171.
5Lei Bao, Edward F. Redish, Model Analysis: Representing and Assessing the Dynamics of Student Learning [J ]. Phys Rev ST Phys Educ Res, 2006, 2:010 103--010 105.
5BROWN J D. Voting systems are discussed at [EB/OL]. [2005-02-17]. http://celt, ust. hk/ideas/prs/exp_share, htm.
6REAY N W, LI P, LEI B. Testing a new voting machine question methodology [J]. Americ Journal of Physics, 2008, 76 (2):171-181.
7TREES A R, JACKSON M H. The learning environment in clicker classrooms: Student processes of learning and in- volvement in large university-level courses using student re- sponse systems [J]. Learning, Media & Technology, 2007, 32(1): 21-40.
8DANGEL H L, WANG C X. Student response systems in higher education., moving beyond linear teaching and surface learning [J]. Journal of Educational Technology Develop- ment and Exchange, 2008, 1: 47-54.
9BOYLE J T, NICOL D J. Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings [J]. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 2008, 11 (3): 43-57.
10PEIN R P, LU J, STAV J B. Integrating mobile compu- ting solutions into distance learning environments [J]. The International Journal Communications of SIWN, 2009, 6: 171-177.
