摘要
加达默尔和成中英均对本体论问题作了哲学探讨。加达默尔的哲学诠释学由此在追问存在,在解释学经验的不断发展中彰显存在的本真含义,是海德格尔本体论的现象学方法与黑格尔辩证法方法的有机结合,体现出由诠释本体转向本体诠释的趋向。成中英的本体诠释学则兼采中西诠释传统之所长,而以中国哲学为本位,主张本体与方法的互动,力图形成一个一体多元的开放系统——本体诠释圆环。对二者的思考向度进行比较分析,可以展示中国哲学思维方式对于本体论问题独特的思考进路,并在某种程度上体现出中国哲学现代重建的根据与合理性。
Both Gadamer and Chung-ying Cheng have studied the ontological problem. In philosophical hermeneutics, based on Heidegger＇s phenomenology and Hegel＇s dialectics, Gadamer started from the pursuing of Dasein, and reached the destination of existence through the developing of hermeneutical experiences, showing the tendency turning from hermeneutical ontology to ontological hermeneutics. On the basis of traditional Chinese philosophy, Cheng＇s onto-hermeneutics tries to combine the positive aspects of both the eastern and western hermeneutic traditions, and claims the onto- hermeneutical unity of methodology and ontology. Comparing the two thinking approaches, we can see the unique Chinese approach to think the ontological problem, and to some degree see the foundation and rationality of modern reconstruction of Chinese philosophy.
出处
《西南交通大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2010年第1期125-129,共5页
Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)
关键词
加达默尔
哲学诠释学
成中英
本体诠释学
海德格尔
现象学
辩证法
本体诠释圆环
Gadamer
philosophical hermeneutics
Chung-ying Cheng
onto-hermeneutics
Heidegger
phenomenology
dialectics
onto-hermeneutical circle
作者简介
吴倩（1983-），女，河北邢台人。博士研究生，主要从事20世纪中国哲学研究。E-mini：wuqiannk@126．com
