期刊文献+

农村集体土地产权“三权分离”论驳析——以土地承包经营权流转中“保留(土地)承包权、转移土地经营权(土地使用权)”观点为例 被引量:52

Discussion,Refution and Analysis on "Separation of Three Rights" in Rural Collective Land Property Rights Taking the Opinion to Reserve the Operation Rights of Land and to Transfer the Management Rights of Land during the Transferring of Operation and Mana
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 土地承包经营权流转已是学术界研究农村土地问题乃至"三农"问题的一个热点。目前,经济学界普遍认为:在土地承包经营权流转中,农村集体土地(农地)产权结构被分解为三种权利,其一是(土地)所有权;其二是(土地)承包权;其三是(土地)经营权(使用权)。即"三权分离"论。本文主要分析土地承包经营权流转其结果农户"保留(土地)承包权、转移土地经营权(土地使用权)"来界定土地承包经营权流转内涵该观点存在的主要问题:(1)土地承包权与土地所有权、土地承包经营权其性质不是同一层次的范畴,且不能并列使用;(2)土地经营权其权利内涵无法界定,不是法定的民事权利;(3)土地使用权其权利内涵不固定、无法界定;(4)土地承包经营权是一个完整的民事权利,无法"分解为(土地)承包权和(土地)经营权或(土地)使用权";(5)流进方取得权利的名称中不存在(土地)经营权。同时,结合在对土地承包经营权流转内涵客观界定的基础上,论证了农村集体土地产权"三权分离"论是不科学的。 Transfer of the contractual right of land has been a hot spot in rural land issues even'Three Rural Issues'research in the academe.At present,it is generally believed by the economists that;in the transfer of the contractual right of land,the rural collective land property rights are separated into three rights. Firstly,it is the ownership(of land);secondly,it is the contract right(of land);finally,it is the management rights(use rights)(of land).That is namely the'separation of three rights'theory.This paper focus on the transfer of contractual land management rights and points out the main problems caused by such view that the content of the transfer of contracted land management rights can be defined as farmers reserve contract rights(of land) and transfer use rights(of land):(1) the land contract right cant be juxtaposed with the ownership and contractual right of land because of their different levels of nature;(2) the right meaning of land management right can't be either defined,or a statutory civil right;(3) the right meaning of land use rights is neither set,nor defined;(4) contractual right of land is a integrated civil right,cant be divided into contract right(of land),management right(of land) or use right(of land ); (5) the management right(of land) is not included in the rights obtained by the buyer.Meanwhile,associated to the definition of the meaning of transfer of the contractual right of land,separation of three rights of rural collective land property rights prove unscientific.
出处 《山东农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第4期1-8,共8页 Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(06BJY074)<依法流转土地承包经营权研究>(丁关良主持) "浙江省社会科学界联合会 浙江省法学会合作课题成果"(课题编号:2009HN09)
作者简介 【作者简介】丁关良(1959-),男,浙江省义乌市人,浙江大学管理学院、浙江大学中国农村发展研究院教授,研究方向为农村法制、土地产权以及企业经营管理。
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献90

共引文献927

同被引文献579

引证文献52

二级引证文献779

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部