2Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences andEducation. High Stakes: Testing for Tracking, Pro- motion and Graduation [R]. National Academy Press,Washington, D. C. , 1999.
3Madaus G, Carolyn A, Lynch P S. A Brief History of Attempt to Monitor Testing [R/OL]. NBETPP, 2001, 2 (2): 1-14. [2014-02-22]. http: //www. be. edu/research/nbetpp/statements/NB_ V2N2. pdf.
4Messick S. Test Validity and the Ethics of Assessment [ J ]. American Psychologist, 1980 (11) : 1012-1027.
5Langenfeld T E, Crocker L M. The Evolution of Va- lidity Theory: Public School Testing, the Courts, and Incompatible Interpretations [ J ]. Educational Assessment, 1994 (2): 149-165.
6Linn R L. Curricular Validity: Convincing the Courts that It was Taught without Precluding the Possibility of Measuring It [M] //The Courts, Validity, and Minimum Competency Testing. Springer Science & Business Media New York, 1983 : 116.
7Merle Steven McClung. Competency Testing Pro- grams: Legal and Educational Issues [J]. Fordham Law Review, 1979 (5) : 652-712.
8Kane, M. T.. Current Concerns in Validity Theory [J]. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2001 (4) : 319-342.
9Messick S. Validity [M] // R L Linn, Educational Measurement (3rd ed.). New York: American Council on F.Aucation and Macmillan, 1989: 17.
10American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council onMeasurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing [S]. Washington, DC. A- merican Educational Research Association. 1999. 146.
