期刊文献+

汉语“副名构造”的认知构造语法分析法——基于“压制、突显、传承、整合”的角度 被引量:46

A Cognitive Construction Grammar Approach to "Adverb + Noun":From the Viewpoint of Coercion,Prominence,Inheritance and Integration
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 汉语中的"副名构造"这一特殊结构在句法、语义、语用等层面上具有以下几个特征:(1)该构造中副词具有明显压制作用,据此从两个方面修补了Goldberg等的构造压制观:a.词汇压制观;b.惯性压制观。(2)该构造中名词在副词的压制下大大衰减其指称功能,以突显其表"典型特征、异常感觉、语气时髦"等语用意义。(3)它从多个其他构造中传承了相关信息,如副形构造、主谓构造、动名构造等。(4)单靠组合原则难以获得该构造丰富的整体含意,必须运用完形理论和整合原则对其作通盘处理。 Many scholars have explained the construction "Adverb + Noun" since it became more and more popular. This paper attempts to analyze the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic information of this construction from the viewpoint of " coercion, prominence, inheritance and integration" in the Cognitive Construction Grammar Theory, thus proposing the following findings : ( 1 ) The coercion of the adverb in this construction will force the following noun to make a change in the direction of "feature", based on which we have revised Goldberg' s Construction Coercion View:a)Coercion may be exerted by lexical item; b) "Inertia Coercion" has been put forward. (2)The referential function of the noun in this construction has greatly decreased under the coercion of the adverb, and its pragmatic meaning of "prototypical feature, unusual feeling, modern style" has been placed into prominence. (3)This construction has inherited a lot of information from its related constructions, such as "Adverb + Adjective ", "Subject + Noun-Predicate", "Verb + Object" etc. (4)Its rich entire meaning can not be solely explained by the Principle of Compositionality, but the Gestalt Psychology and the Principle of Integration is of much more explanatory power.
作者 王寅
出处 《外国语文》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期1-8,共8页 Foreign Languages and Literature
关键词 认知构造语法 副名构造 压制 突显 传承 整合 Cognitive Construction Grammar "Adverb + Noun" Construct coercion prominence inheritance integration
作者简介 王寅,男,江苏盐城人,四川外语学院外国语文研究中心教授,中国认知语言学研究会副会长,主要从事认知语言学、语义学和英汉语对比研究。
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Fillmore, Charles J. , Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O' Connor. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone [J] . Language, 1998 (64) :501 -538.
  • 2Goldberg, A. E. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [ M ]. Chicago and London :The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  • 3Goldberg, A. E. Making One' s Way Through the Data [ C ]// Shibatani, M. & S. A. Thompson. Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning. OUP. 1996:29 - 53.
  • 4Goldberg, A. E. Constructions at Work : the Nature of Generalization in Language[ M]. O0UP,2006.
  • 5Goldberg, A. E. & Ray Jackendoff. The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions [J]. Language, 2004 (80) :532 -568.
  • 6Jackendoff, R. S. Twistin' the Night Away [ J ]. Language, 1997(73) :534 -559.
  • 7Kay, P. & Fillmore, C. Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: the What' s X doing Y ? Construction[J]. Language, 1999(75) :1 -33.
  • 8Taylor,John. Linguistic Gategorization-Prototypes in Linguistic Theory[ M ]. OUP, 1989.
  • 9Wierzbicka, Anna. Boys Will Be Boys: Radical Semanticsvs. Radical Pragmatics [ J ]. Language, 1987 (63) : 95-114.
  • 10储泽祥,刘街生.“细节显现”与“副+名”[J].语文建设,1997,0(6):15-19. 被引量:190

二级参考文献45

共引文献809

同被引文献456

引证文献46

二级引证文献315

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部