摘要
我国刑法界对侵占罪之遗忘物的界定存在着重大分歧,严重阻碍了侵占罪的司法实践。通过考察国外及我国古代刑法与遗失物制度的有关规定可知,民法上的遗失物在适用我国侵占罪中关于遗忘物的相关规定时存在着不合理性。刑法上的遗忘物应与委托他人保管的财物具有相同的地位,拾得人违反其特定的从业要求和生活期待是认定遗忘物的关键。
The difference in comprehension of forgotten property in criminal law baffles the judicatory practice. The analysis of the law of the crime of misappropriation and the lost property system of China and foreign countries, explores the irrationality of equalling the lost property to the forgotten property. The forgotten property ought to be regared as the same legal statues as the consignment. The doer infringing the specifical requst of his profession is the key element to ascertain the forgotten property from lost property.
出处
《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》
2007年第6期681-687,共7页
Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences
关键词
侵占罪
遗忘物
遗失物
the crime of misappropriation
forgotten property
the lost property
作者简介
张纪寒（1969-），女，长沙人，武汉大学法学院博士研究生，中南大学法学院副教授，主要研究方向：刑法学．
