摘要
关于诉讼证明标准问题,学界历来存有争议,其中客观真实与法律真实更是关注的焦点。我国目前的诉讼证明标准仍有不合理因素,不能适应司法实践的客观需要,因此应予重构。较为科学的做法是以法律真实统领三大诉讼,但对不同性质的诉讼应区别对待。就民事诉讼和刑事诉讼来说,还应在这一标准内部凸显适用灵活性和体系完整性。
As to the standard proof of litigation,great controversies have existed for a long time in academic circle in which 'objective truth' and 'legal truth' are highlighted.China's current standard of Litigation Proof still has some unfavorable factors which are not accustomed to the objective reality of judicial practice and therefore should be reconstructed.One of scientific ways is that legal truth guides the three kinds of litigations,and deals with them on the basis of their nature.In terms of civil and criminal litigation,we should also highlight the flexibility and integrity of the standard.
出处
《河南社会科学》
北大核心
2007年第2期65-67,共3页
Henan Social Sciences
作者简介
韦留柱（1963-），男，河南新密人，河南师范大学法学院副教授，硕士生导师，主要从事诉讼法学和理论法学研究。
