摘要
把一个固定的着手“点”预定为可罚行为起点,违反了刑法作为经验科学的规律,这是形而上学的自然科学主义思维,在今天应当被清算;而中国的着手理论更非可罚行为起点;因此,再建可罚行为起点理论是刑法学的一项基础性工作。可罚行为起点应当从罪过的明确性、主体推动犯罪进行的不停顿性、行为的危险性和形式上的非法性等四个方面进行综合的具体判断。
To presuppose a fixed starting po rule that criminal law is a pragmatic science and int of a crime as the starting point of a punishable act violates the should thus be repudiated as a metaphysical natural science idea. In China, since the theory of starting point of a crime varies greatly from the starting point of a punishable act, to reconstruct the theory of the starting point of a punishable act is of primary importance in the science of criminal law. The starting point of a punishable act should be determined in light of the certainty of culpability, continuity of the perpetrator＇ s act, endangerment of the crime and illegitimacy of form.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第1期114-123,共10页
Modern Law Science
基金
"中国博士后科学基金"(2005038033)--<刑事可罚根据研究>的阶段性成果。
关键词
着手
可罚行为起点
犯罪构成
starting point of a crime
starting point of a punishable act
constitution of a crime
作者简介
高艳东（1977-）,男,山东烟台人，北京大学法学院博士后研究人员，法学博士。
