摘要
本文围绕如何界定后现代主义的问题,梳理了后现代主义思潮几种比较重要的理论表征,指出界定后现代主义的真正困难在于其理论愿景与方法之间的悖离,表现为指称悖论、系统悖论和操作悖论。在此基础上,笔者试图把后现代主义思潮定位为一种以“解构”的方法为核心的“研究纲领”,即后现代主义思潮的理论内核是其解构的方法,外围是各种不同的理论。这种界定有助于我们站在马克思主义立场上把握后现代主义思潮。
This article analyzes important theories of post-modermsm arouna now to define post-modernism. The author points out that the problem of defining post-modernism lies in separation of its theories and methodology in terms of the paradox of reference, the paradox of system and the paradox of operation. Based on this analysis, the author attempts to define post-modernism as a research program with a methodology of destructuralism. In other words, the core of post-modernist theories is its destructuralist method, around which are various theories. Post- modernism thus defined may help grasp post-modernist ideas from the perspective of Marxism.
出处
《教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第12期77-80,共4页
Teaching and Research
关键词
后现代
逻辑悖论
研究纲领
post-modernism
paradox of logic
research program
作者简介
杨鸿江（1975-），男，山东武城人，中共中央党校讲师，主要研究方向为西方哲学和行政文化。
