摘要
近百年来,中国哲学史研究,由谢无量的《中国哲学史》到胡适的《中国哲学史大纲》发生了由“中国的哲学”史到“西方哲学在中国”的历史转化,冯友兰20世纪30年代的《中国哲学史》是“西方哲学在中国”的经典之作。这一研究思路是“依傍”西方哲学的表格或框架到中国古籍中筛选资料填入已有的表格或框架中,是用西方这一特殊形态的哲学去剪裁中国这一特殊形态的哲学,中国哲学的主体性丧失了,中国哲学史变成了西方哲学在中国的发现史,学者们原想以此论证中国哲学的“合法性”,结果却导致更深层的“合法性”危机。由此,中国哲学史必须从“依傍”走向主体自觉,由“西方哲学在中国”的发现式研究回归到“中国的哲学”史即中国哲学固有义理逻辑展开历程的研究。
Within the recent hundred years, a historical shift took place in the studies Chinese philosophy, from Wu-Liang Xie’ A History for Chinese Philosophy, to Shi Hu’ An Outline of Chinese Philosophy, by the form of the history of Chinese Philosophy to western philosophy in China, which is ultimate by You-Lan Feng’ A History of Chinese Philosophy. His research depends upon the categories of Western philosophy, and then selects materials from Chinese classics, fills them into the categories, It is to cut out the special philosophical modes of China by the means of Western philosophical mode. Consequently, the subjectivity of Chinese philosophy vanished. The history of Chinese philosophy turned out to be a history of discovering Western philosophy in China. This deprived a deep crisis of the legitimacy of Chinese philosophy. Therefore, the history of Chinese philosophy must shift from dependence toward the enlightemnent of autonomy, from primordial research of discovering Western philosophy in China to Chinese philosophy, ad hoc, the studies of the process of the immanent and logical views of Chinese philosophy.
出处
《文史哲》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第3期26-32,共7页
Literature,History,and Philosophy
关键词
哲学在中国
中国的哲学
表格
普遍
特殊
Philosophy in China
Chinese philosophy
Category
General
Special
