摘要
目的比较不同肌力训练方法对踝关节创伤性关节炎患者功能恢复的影响.方法选取2018年5月—2020年5月在该院就诊的80例踝关节创伤性关节炎患者,随机分成实验组和对照组,各40例.对照组采用常规物理治疗,实验组在对照组基础上采用Maitland和BTE Primus RS治疗,对比两组治疗效果.结果治疗后,实验组的视觉模拟评分(visual analogue score,VAS)、美国足踝外科医师协会踝-后足评分系统(American Orthopaedic foot and ankle society,AOFAS)评分、治疗优良率、肌力和踝关节活动范围均显著优于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论Maitland和BTE Primus RS治疗对踝关节创伤性关节炎患者功能恢复的效果明显优于常规物理治疗,值得临床推广应用.
Objective To compare the effects of different muscle strength training methods on the functional recovery of patients with ankle joint traumatic arthritis.Methods A total of 80 patients with traumatic ankle arthritis in the hospital from May 2018 to May 2020 were selected and randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group,with 40 cases in each group.The control group was treated with conventional physical therapy,and the experimental group was treated with Maitland and BTE Primus RS on the basis of the control group.The treatment effects of the two groups were compared.Results After treatment,the experimental group's visual analogue score(VAS),American orthopaedic foot and ankle society(AOFAS)score,treatment excellent rate,muscle strength and ankle range of motion were significantly better than those of the control group,the differences between the groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Maitland and BTE Primus RS treatments are significantly better than conventional physical therapy for the functional recovery of patients with traumatic ankle arthritis,and are worthy of clinical application.
作者
朱建民
ZHU Jianmin(Department of Hand and Foot Surgery,Jining Second People's Hospital,Jining Shandong,272000,China)
出处
《反射疗法与康复医学》
2021年第3期114-116,共3页
Reflexology And Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词
肌力训练
踝关节
创伤性关节炎
功能恢复
疼痛程度
Strength training
Ankle joint
Traumatic arthritis
Functional recovery
Pain degree
作者简介
朱建民(1967-),男,山东济宁人,本科,副主任医师,研究方向:手足外科临床。
