摘要
《量刑指导意见》构建的"三步式"规范化量刑方法的两个关键环节就是确定基准刑和通过量刑情节调节基准刑.《量刑指导意见》就个罪哪些事实应属于其他犯罪构成事实用以增加刑罚量规定不明确,影响了个罪基准刑认定的统一性和科学性,因而应在《量刑指导意见》中明确规定个罪其他犯罪构成事实的具体内容.《量刑指导意见》将调节基准刑的量刑情节进行是否优先适用的类型划分,契合了量刑责任主义的要求,应将这种划分贯彻始终,以保证反映责任刑的量刑情节均能得到优先适用.
The sentencing method stipulated by Sentencing Guidelines Rules has two key links which are benchmark punishment and circumstances of sentencing.The other crimes constitute facts are not explicitly stipulated.It will influence uniformity and scientificity of the benchmark punishment.It should be explicitly stipulated in Sentencing Guidelines Rules.The circumstances of sentencing are divided into two types.Some are preferentially applied,and the others are not.This classification meets the requirements of sentencing responsibility doctrine.Therefore,the classification of the circumstances of sentencing should be further observed,in order to make sure that all the circumstances of sentencing which reflect obligation punishment are preferentially applied.
出处
《刑法论丛》
2019年第4期152-176,共25页
Criminal Law Review
关键词
量刑规范化
量刑方法
其他犯罪构成事实
量刑情节
Standardization of Sentencing
Sentencing Method
Other Crimes Constitute Facts
Circumstances of Sentencing
作者简介
梁文彩,甘肃政法大学法学院副教授,法学博士。
