摘要
民事诉讼中的当事人陈述分为主张型陈述与证据型陈述,这两种陈述的功能与属性存在明显区别,当事人的虚假陈述也相应地分为主张型虚假陈述与证据型虚假陈述。我国民事诉讼法中的诚实信用原则为规制虚假陈述提供了宏观上的依据与指导。对虚假陈述的具体规制应当建立在上述分类的基础上,对主张型虚假陈述,原则上应当采用在作出心证时给予不利评价等方法,而对于证据型虚假陈述,则可以适用《民事诉讼法》第114条关于伪造重要证据的规定对当事人处以罚款。当事人作了主张型虚假陈述同时存在虚假诉讼或者伪造证据的,可按照虚假诉讼、伪造证据的规定对其进行处罚。
The representations of the parties to a civil litigation are divided into claim-related representations and evidence-related representations,where there are significant differences between them in terms of functions and nature.Similarly,the misrepresentations of the parties are also divided into claim-related misrepresentations and evidence-related representations.In Chinese civil litigations,the principle of good faith offers a macro basis and guidance for the regulation of misrepresentations.The specific regulations of misrepresentations should be based on the above classification.For claim-related misrepresentations,in principle,unfavorable evaluation of the evidence should be made,etc.,and for evidence-related misrepresentations,fines for falsification of important evidence can be imposed in accordance with Article 114 of the Civil Procedure Law.Where claim-related misrepresentations involve false litigation or falsification of evidence,the penalties may be imposed as per the provisions on false litigation or falsification of evidence.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第5期167-178,共12页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
民事诉讼
当事人虚假陈述
主张型当事人陈述
证据型当事人陈述
诉讼罚款
civil litigation
misrepresentations of a party
claim-related representations
evidence-related representations
litigation fine
作者简介
李浩,安徽大学特任教授、南京师范大学中国法治现代化研究院研究员。
