摘要
伴随着刑法归责理论发展的主观主义与客观主义的立场对立存在于两个层面上,一是归责的内容为主观要素还是客观要素,二是归责的立场是行为人标准还是一般人标准。真正应当解决的是第二个层面,并以一般人基准来构建归责理论。在一般人标准下,核心的判断内容为客观的预见可能性判断。客观预见可能性通过客观合目的性筛选主体意志与结果之间相关联的内容,通过相当性判断筛选符合自然意义上因果关联,但不满足经验事实的内容。至于客观预见可能性的具体作用,不在于行为危险性即行为不法的判断,而是作为排除行为与结果之间归责的工具。
Accompanied by development of imputation of criminal law theory of subjectivism and objectivism of antagonists exists in two aspects,one is the content of the imputation of subjective and objective elements,the second is the position of imputation is the offender should be standard or the average person really is the second level,with reference to the average person build imputation theory under the average person standard,the core content for the objective possibility of prediction evaluation of objective possibility foreseen by objective purposiveness screening is associated with the results between the content of the subject will,through determine screening accord with natural sense causal association,but does not meet the content of the empirical fact As for the specific function of objective foreseeability,it does not lie in the judgment of the wrongful act,but as a tool to exclude the imputation between the act and the result.
出处
《刑法论丛》
2021年第2期1-23,共23页
Criminal Law Review
基金
国家社科基金重大课题(17ZDA135)
司法部重点项目(17SFB1004)
华东政法大学优秀博士论文培育项目(2020-1-014)资助
关键词
客观预见可能性
主观归责
客观归责
一般人标准
Objective Foreseeability
Subjective Attribution
Objective Attribution
Ordinary Person Standard
作者简介
纪康,华东政法大学刑法学博士研究生。
