摘要
"潘洪斌审查建议案"暴露了备案审查功能上的短板,对此,可以考虑建立以法院审查"补强"备案审查的机制,系统性地完善我国的合宪性审查制度。法院审查是成文宪法体制下法院的责任,其实质是司法过程基于个案的合宪性审查,旨在落实宪法最高效力,同时直接作用于诉讼当事人的权利救济。补强机制的构建,在整体上宜确立审查权力的"双审"配置,并形成有效的"回路"控制;在实体上宜确立法院审查的范围,明确不同层次法律规范审查上的分工;在程序上宜确立法院审查与备案审查之间的衔接技术,采用一般、特殊、补充三种程序规则,实现二者之间的合作。
"The case of Pan Hongbin’s review request"reveals the weaknesses in the functionality of record review.In this regard,it is advisable to establish a mechanism in which the court review"reinforces"the record review to systematically improve the constitutional review system in China.The court review is the responsibility of the court under the written constitutional system,the essence of which is the constitutional review of the judicial process based on individual cases,which aims to implement the supreme effectiveness of the constitution and directly acts on the right remedy of litigants.To constructing the"reinforcing"mechanism,as a whole,it is recommended to establish a"dual-review"configuration of review power and form an effective"loop"control;in substance,it is wise to define the scope of court review and clarify the division of labor at different levels of legal and regulatory review;In terms of procedures,it is advisable to establish the connection between the court review and the record review,and adopt general,special and supplementary procedural rules to achieve cooperation between the two types of review.
出处
《江苏社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第1期100-109,242-243,共12页
Jiangsu Social Sciences
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“世界各国代议制度与中国人大制度比较研究”(17JJD820001)阶段性成果
作者简介
赵娟,南京大学法学院教授,南京大学-约翰斯·霍普金斯大学中美文化研究中心兼职教授
