摘要
近年来,针对社会学本土化的争论备受瞩目,但少有学者专门从知识社会学的角度检视这一问题意识兴起的社会和文化动因。本文从中国知识分子的传统特征切入,将以吴文藻、孙本文、费孝通为代表的“五四”社会学家和1979年中国内地社会学重建后的“知青”社会学家同时纳入比较分析的视野,探讨中国知识分子的民族性、实践性和思教性传统与社会学本土化问题意识之间的内在联系。通过分析发现,这三大知识分子传统特征在“五四”和“知青”两代社会学家身上具有明显的承续性,因而部分解释了作为一种话语的社会学本土化为何能够在中国社会学历经百年沧桑后仍旧方兴未艾。
In recent years,the debate over the indigenization of sociology has got much spotlight,but few scholars have specifically examined the social and cultural causes of the rise of this issue from the perspective of the sociology of knowledge.Starting from the traditional characteristics of Chinese intellectuals,this paper puts both the May 4th sociologists,represented by Wu Wenzao,Sun Benwen and Fei Xiaotong,and the so-called“educated youth”sociologists,who arose from the reconstruction of Chinese sociology in 1979,into the perspective of comparative analysis,and explores the intrinsic relationship between the national,practical and ideological characteristics of traditional Chinese intellectuals and the issue awareness pertaining to the indigenization of sociology.Through analysis,it is found that the three traditional characteristics mentioned above have obvious continuity between the May 4th sociologists and their“educated youth”successors,which partly explains why indigenization of sociology as a discourse can still be in the ascendance after a century of vicissitudes in Chinese society.
作者
彭圣钦
周晓虹
Peng Shengqin;Zhou Xiaohong(School of Social and Behavioral Sciences,Nanjing University)
出处
《开放时代》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第3期38-56,6,共20页
Open Times
基金
南京大学“双一流”建设卓越研究计划“社会学理论与中国研究”项目资助
关键词
社会学本土化
知识分子传统
“五四”社会学家
“知青”社会学家
indigenization of sociology
traditions of intellectuals
May 4th sociologists
“educated youth”sociologists
