摘要
将侵权获利作为损害赔偿的法定计算标准之一是知识产权侵权损害赔偿制度的重要内容。这一独特的制度安排引起了学界对知识产权侵权获利返还的请求权基础性质之争。与知识产权法作为民法的特殊领域相对应的是,针对知识产权侵权获利返还的请求权基础的探讨、研究也应回归传统民法之内。通过对损害赔偿请求权说及不当得利请求权说的主张及缺陷进行比较,从条文本身的体系及目的等角度出发,应当认为知识产权侵权获利返还的请求权基础为损害赔偿请求权。
The infringement profit counting as one of the statutory calculation standards for damages is an important institute of the intellectual property rights infringement system.This unique institute has caused the scholars to argue a lot about the basis of the claim right of the return of the infringement profit in intellectual property rights infringement.Corresponding to the special field of intellectual property law as civil law,the discussion and research on the basis of the claim right of the return of the infringement profit should also be returned to the scope of traditional civil law.By discussing the systemic and purpose of the text,it should be considered that the basis of the claim right for the return of infringement profit is a claim for damages.
作者
李红锦
LI Hong-jin(Law School of University of Saarland,Saarbrueeken 66111,Germany)
出处
《湖南人文科技学院学报》
2020年第1期11-15,共5页
Journal of Hunan University of Humanities,Science and Technology
基金
中国国家留基委“国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目”(201907080016).
关键词
知识产权
侵权获利返还
请求权基础
不当得利
损害赔偿
intellectual property rights
return of infringement profit
the basis of the claim right
unjust enrichment
damages
作者简介
李红锦(1994—),女,湖南邵阳人,德国萨尔大学法学院在读博士,研究方向:知识产权法。