摘要
我国刑事诉讼程序兼具治罪与治理的双重功能。程序的治罪功能是在查清犯罪事实的基础上,惩罚犯罪行为人。目前,治罪功能仍是刑事诉讼程序功能的核心,但我国已经逐渐步入“轻罪时代”,以治罪功能为中心的刑事诉讼程序对轻罪的犯罪控制效果不佳,还容易引发刑罚溢出等风险。因此,刑事诉讼程序功能中心应当转向治理。刑事诉讼程序的治理功能以犯罪行为人为治理对象,既治理引发犯罪的道德层面因素,又治理引发犯罪的社会结构性因素,主要目的是预防犯罪,进一步维护社会秩序,这更符合轻罪的犯罪控制需求。具体而言,我国有必要通过扩大犯罪治理的社会参与主体面、丰富多元化的程序替代机制、强化程序的商谈性来构建以治理为中心的轻罪诉讼程序。
The criminal procedure has a dual function of both punishment and governance.The criminal function of a procedure is to punish the perpetrator based on the facts of the crime.At present,the function of punishment is still the core of criminal procedure,but China has gradually entered the era of"misdemeanor".The criminal procedure centered on punishment has poor control effect on minor crimes and also has limitations such as penalty overflow.Therefore,the function of criminal proceedings in China should shift towards governance as the center.The governance function of the procedure focuses on the criminal behavior as the object of governance,which not only governs the conscience of the criminal behavior,but also the social structural reasons for the occurrence of criminal problems.Its purpose is to prevent crime and further maintain social order,so it is more in line with the needs of crime control for minor offenses.Specifically,it is necessary for our country to promote the construction of a procedure centered on governance by expanding the social participants in crime governance,enriching diverse procedural substitution mechanisms,and strengthening the negotiability of procedures.
作者
李盛璇
陈永生
LI Sheng-xuan;CHEN Yong-sheng
出处
《四川警察学院学报》
2024年第3期29-39,共11页
Journal of Sichuan Police College
基金
司法部法治建设与法学理论研究一般项目:“法律援助法实施问题与对策研究”(22SFB3019)
关键词
治罪
治理
刑事诉讼
程序功能
转向
minor offenses
punishment
governance
center
turn
作者简介
李盛璇,男,湖南益阳人,北京大学法学院硕士研究生,主要从事刑事诉讼法学研究;陈永生,男,湖北蕲春人,北京大学法学院教授,博士研究生导师,主要从事刑事诉讼法学、司法制度、证据法学研究。
