摘要
在中国古代,儒家经义嵌含于法理概念的意义结构中,"法理"一词通常指向君臣之义、父子之义、夫妻之义等伦理纲常。到了近代,法理概念的内容指向发生了双重转型。其一,在立法场域,法理概念的指称内容实现了由天理观到公理观的再造,"法理"之"理"开始指向平等、自由等公理原则。其二,相应地,在司法场域,儒家经义开始脱嵌于法理概念的意义结构,"法理"一词开始摆脱伦理纲常的道德纠葛,对法律文本的依附趋于强化。
In ancient China,the Confucianists were embedded in the meaning structure of the concept of"Fali",which usually points to the moral principles between monarch and minister,fathers and sons,and husband and wife.In modern times,the concept of"Fali"had undergone a double transformation.First,in the legislative field,the alleged content of the concept of"Fali"realized the re-creation from the view of heavenly principles to the view of generally acknowledged truth,and"Fali"began to point to the principle of equality and freedom.Second,accordingly,in the judicial field,the Confucian classics were removed from the meaning structure of the concept of"Fali",and the word"Fali"began to get rid of the entanglement of the three cardinal guides and the five constant virtues,and the attachment to the legal texts tended to be strengthened.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第3期24-38,共15页
Law and Social Development
基金
国家社会科学基金重大专项项目“新时代中国特色法学基本理论问题研究”(18VXK004)的阶段性成果
关键词
法理
儒家经义
天理
公理
Fali
Confucian Classics
Heavenly Principles
Generally Acknowledged Truth
作者简介
郭栋,北京大学法学院博士后研究人员。
