摘要
长期以来,学界存在一种颇为流行的观念,即知识产权具有特殊性,故知识产权问题不适用民法的一般原理和规则。这种观念不仅阻碍了对知识产权本质属性的认知,更直接影响了知识产权的立法、司法与执法等法律实践。这种观念建立于“三重误读”之上,即将权利与权利对象混为一谈,错误认识知识产权对象的自然属性,以及想当然地认为权利对象的特殊性决定了权利本身的特殊性。因此,有必要阐明这种观念的要害,澄清知识产权对象的自然属性,论述为什么权利对象的特殊性并不决定权利的特殊性,进而从根本上消除认识上的迷思,证成知识产权的私权基因与民法母体。
For a long time,there is a generally accepted conception in academic circles,that intellectual property rights are particular,so the general principles and rules of civil law are not applicable for solving the problems of intellectual property rights.This conception not only hinders the understanding of the nature of intellectual property rights,but also affects directly the legislative,judicial and enforcement practices of intellectual property rights.This conception is based on the“triple misreading”,which includes confusing rights with the objects of rights,misunderstanding the natural attributes of intellectual property objects,and assuming that the characteristics of the object of rights determine the characteristics of the rights.Therefore,it is necessary to elucidate the essence of this conception,clarify the natural attributes of the objects of intellectual property rights,discuss why the characteristics of the objects of those rights does not lead to the particularity of rights itself,and fundamentally eliminate the myth of conception and justify the private-right gene of intellectual property rights and their belongingness to civil law.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第4期132-149,共18页
Law and Social Development
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“创新驱动发展战略下知识产权公共领域问题研究”(17ZDA138)
中央民族大学青年学术团队引领计划项目“大数据运用机理与法律保护问题研究”(2022QNYL24)的阶段性成果
关键词
知识产权
体系化
特殊性
事实与价值二分
Intellectual Property Rights
Systematization
Particularity
Fact-Value Dichotomy
作者简介
熊文聪,中央民族大学法学院副教授。
